Olmo-Montes Francisco-Jesús, Hernández-Cruz Blanca, Miranda Mª José, Jimenez-Moreno Mª Dolores, Vázquez-Gámez Mª Ángeles, Giner Mercè, Colmenero Miguel-Angel, Pérez-Venegas José Javier, Montoya-García María-José
Internal Medicine Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Dr Fedriani Avenue No 3, 41009 Seville, Spain.
Rheumatology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Dr Fedriani Avenue No 3, 41009 Seville, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 17;10(18):4220. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184220.
To describe the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS), to know the characteristics of the patients attended with emphasis on sex differences, and to know the compliance of International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) quality standards.
Observational, prospective research. All the consecutive patients that attended in usual clinical practice from May 2018 to October 2019, were over 50 years, and with a fragility fracture (FF), were included.
Our FLS is a type A multidisciplinary unit. We included 410 patients, 80% women. FF recorded in 328 women were: Hip (132, 40%), Clinical Vertebral (81, 25%) and No hip No vertebral (115, 35%). Those in 82 men were: Hip (53, 66%), Clinical Vertebral (20, 24%) and No hip No vertebral (9, 10%), = 0.0001. Men had more secondary osteoporosis (OP). The most remarkable result was the low percentage of patients with OP receiving treatment and the differences between sex. Forty-nine (16%) women versus nine (7%) men had received it at some point in their lives, = 0.04. The probability of a man not receiving prior treatment was 2.5 (95%CI 1.01-6.51); = 0.04, and after the FF was 0.64 (0.38-1.09). Treatment adherence in the first year after the FLS was 96% in both sexes. The completion of IOF quality standards was bad for patient identification and reference time. It was poor for initial OP screening standard and good for the remaining ten indicators.
the FLS narrowed the gap in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of fragility fracture patients, especially men. The FLS meets the IOF quality standards.
描述骨折联络服务(FLS),了解就诊患者的特征,重点关注性别差异,并了解国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)质量标准的依从情况。
观察性前瞻性研究。纳入2018年5月至2019年10月在日常临床实践中就诊的所有连续患者,年龄超过50岁,且有脆性骨折(FF)。
我们的FLS是一个A型多学科单位。我们纳入了410例患者,其中80%为女性。328名女性记录的FF为:髋部骨折(132例,40%)、临床椎体骨折(81例,25%)和非髋部非椎体骨折(115例,35%)。82名男性的FF为:髋部骨折(53例,66%)、临床椎体骨折(20例,24%)和非髋部非椎体骨折(9例,10%),P = 0.0001。男性继发性骨质疏松(OP)更多。最显著的结果是OP患者接受治疗的比例较低以及性别差异。49名(16%)女性与9名(7%)男性在其生命中的某个时刻接受过治疗,P = 0.04。男性未接受过先前治疗的概率为2.5(95%CI 1.01 - 6.51);P = 0.04,骨折后为0.64(0.38 - 1.09)。FLS后第一年的治疗依从性在两性中均为96%。IOF质量标准在患者识别和参考时间方面完成情况较差。初始OP筛查标准完成情况较差,其余十项指标完成情况良好。
FLS缩小了脆性骨折患者,尤其是男性患者在诊断、治疗和随访方面的差距。FLS符合IOF质量标准。