Department of Neurotoxicology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Pathophysiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 8;22(18):9737. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189737.
The term epileptogenesis defines the usually durable process of converting normal brain into an epileptic one. The resistance of a significant proportion of patients with epilepsy to the available pharmacotherapy prompted the concept of a causative treatment option consisting in stopping or modifying the progress of epileptogenesis. Most antiepileptic drugs possess only a weak or no antiepileptogenic potential at all, but a few of them appear promising in this regard; these include, for example, eslicarbazepine (a sodium and T-type channel blocker), lamotrigine (a sodium channel blocker and glutamate antagonist) or levetiracetam (a ligand of synaptic vehicle protein SV2A). Among the approved non-antiepileptic drugs, antiepileptogenic potential seems to reside in losartan (a blocker of angiotensin II type 1 receptors), biperiden (an antiparkinsonian drug), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antioxidative drugs and minocycline (a second-generation tetracycline with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties). Among other possible antiepileptogenic compounds, antisense nucleotides have been considered, among these an antagomir targeting microRNA-134. The drugs and agents mentioned above have been evaluated in post-status epilepticus models of epileptogenesis, so their preventive efficacy must be verified. Limited clinical data indicate that biperiden in patients with brain injuries is well-tolerated and seems to reduce the incidence of post-traumatic epilepsy. Exceptionally, in this regard, our own original data presented here point to c-Fos as an early seizure duration, but not seizure intensity-related, marker of early epileptogenesis. Further research of reliable markers of early epileptogenesis is definitely needed to improve the process of designing adequate antiepileptogenic therapies.
癫痫发生学一词定义了将正常大脑转变为癫痫样大脑的通常持久的过程。由于相当一部分癫痫患者对现有药物治疗的耐药性,促使人们提出了一种病因治疗的选择,即阻止或改变癫痫发生学的进展。大多数抗癫痫药物在这方面的作用微弱或根本没有,但其中一些药物似乎很有前景;例如,依佐加滨(一种钠和 T 型通道阻滞剂)、拉莫三嗪(一种钠通道阻滞剂和谷氨酸拮抗剂)或左乙拉西坦(突触载体蛋白 SV2A 的配体)。在已批准的非抗癫痫药物中,抗癫痫发生学作用似乎存在于氯沙坦(血管紧张素 II 型 1 受体阻滞剂)、比哌立登(一种抗帕金森病药物)、非甾体抗炎药、抗氧化剂和米诺环素(一种具有抗炎和抗氧化特性的第二代四环素)中。在其他可能的抗癫痫发生化合物中,已经考虑了反义核苷酸,其中一种针对 microRNA-134 的反义寡核苷酸。上述药物和制剂已在癫痫发生的癫痫后模型中进行了评估,因此必须验证其预防效果。有限的临床数据表明,脑损伤患者中使用比哌立登耐受良好,似乎可以降低外伤性癫痫的发病率。例外的是,就这方面而言,我们这里提出的原创数据表明 c-Fos 是早期癫痫持续时间的标志物,但与癫痫发作强度无关,是早期癫痫发生的标志物。进一步研究可靠的早期癫痫发生标志物对于改善设计适当的抗癫痫发生治疗方法的过程肯定是必要的。