Department of Applied Informatics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 8;21(18):6020. doi: 10.3390/s21186020.
The paper presents studies on biometric identification methods based on the eye movement signal. New signal features were investigated for this purpose. They included its representation in the frequency domain and the largest Lyapunov exponent, which characterizes the dynamics of the eye movement signal seen as a nonlinear time series. These features, along with the velocities and accelerations used in the previously conducted works, were determined for 100-ms eye movement segments. 24 participants took part in the experiment, composed of two sessions. The users' task was to observe a point appearing on the screen in 29 locations. The eye movement recordings for each point were used to create a feature vector in two variants: one vector for one point and one vector including signal for three consecutive locations. Two approaches for defining the training and test sets were applied. In the first one, 75% of randomly selected vectors were used as the training set, under a condition of equal proportions for each participant in both sets and the disjointness of the training and test sets. Among four classifiers: NN ( = 5), decision tree, naïve Bayes, and random forest, good classification performance was obtained for decision tree and random forest. The efficiency of the last method reached 100%. The outcomes were much worse in the second scenario when the training and testing sets when defined based on recordings from different sessions; the possible reasons are discussed in the paper.
本文提出了基于眼动信号的生物识别方法研究。为此目的,研究了新的信号特征。它们包括在频域中的表示和最大 Lyapunov 指数,它描述了眼动信号的动力学,被视为非线性时间序列。这些特征与之前的研究中使用的速度和加速度一起,用于确定 100ms 的眼动片段。24 名参与者参加了由两个阶段组成的实验。用户的任务是观察屏幕上 29 个位置的一个点。对于每个点的眼动记录,用于创建两个变体的特征向量:一个向量用于一个点,一个向量包括三个连续位置的信号。应用了两种定义训练集和测试集的方法。在第一种方法中,随机选择的 75%的向量作为训练集,在两组中每个参与者的比例相等且训练集和测试集不相交的条件下。在四个分类器中:NN(=5)、决策树、朴素贝叶斯和随机森林,决策树和随机森林的分类性能较好。最后一种方法的效率达到了 100%。当根据不同会话的记录定义训练集和测试集时,第二种情况下的结果要差得多;本文讨论了可能的原因。