Tubiana Sarah, Labarere José, Levraut Jacques, Michelet Pierre, de Vaux Fleur Jourda, Doumenc Benoit, Hausfater Pierre, Choquet Christophe, Plaisance Patrick, Schmidt Jeannot, Mattei Véronique, Gacia Olivier, Storme Didier, Ray Patrick, Der Sahakian Guillaume, Kouka Marie-Clément, Jainsky Laure, Raude Jocelyn, Duval Xavier, Claessens Yann-Erick
AP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, INSERM CIC 1425, F-75018 Paris, France.
Université de Paris, IAME, INSERM, F-75018 Paris, France.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 28;9(9):962. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9090962.
We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted procedure in improving pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations 6 months after an emergency department (ED) visit among patients aged 65 years and older.
We conducted a cluster-randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label implementation trial in 18 EDs in France and Monaco. Participants were recruited from November 2015 to September 2016. EDs were randomly assigned with a 1:1 ratio to provide either a multifaceted procedure that combined structured information about pneumococcal and influenza vaccines and three text message reminders sent to patients every two weeks (intervention arm) or nonstructured information only (control arm). The outcomes were self-reported pneumococcal vaccination and influenza vaccination rates within 6 months of enrollment.
A total of 9 EDs were randomized to the intervention arm (n = 780 patients) and 9 to the control arm (n = 695 patients). The median age for all enrolled patients was 74 years (25-75th percentiles, 69 to 82): 50.1% were male, 34.9% had at least one underlying condition, and 30.7% were at risk for invasive pneumococcal infection. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the multifaceted intervention did not alter the pneumococcal vaccination rate (6.4% versus 4.6%, absolute difference: 1.8; 95% CI: [-0.9 to 4.4]; = 0.19), whereas it improved the influenza vaccination rate (52.1% versus 40.0%, absolute difference: 12.1; 95% CI: [2.4 to 21.8]; = 0.01). At 12 months, mortality did not differ between the intervention (9.7%) and control (11.2%) arms ( = 0.35).
A multifaceted intervention based on text message reminders provides an opportunity to increase anti-influenza vaccination among elderly patients visiting the ED. Efforts are warranted to provide better information on pneumococcal diseases and the benefits of pneumococcal vaccines, especially in the elderly.
我们旨在评估一种多方面干预措施在改善65岁及以上患者急诊就诊6个月后肺炎球菌和流感疫苗接种情况方面的有效性。
我们在法国和摩纳哥的18家急诊科进行了一项整群随机、对照、平行组、开放标签的实施试验。参与者于2015年11月至2016年9月招募。急诊科以1:1的比例随机分配,分别提供一种多方面干预措施,该措施结合了关于肺炎球菌和流感疫苗的结构化信息以及每两周向患者发送的三条短信提醒(干预组),或仅提供非结构化信息(对照组)。结局指标为入组后6个月内自我报告的肺炎球菌疫苗接种率和流感疫苗接种率。
共有9家急诊科被随机分配至干预组(n = 780例患者),9家被分配至对照组(n = 695例患者)。所有入组患者的中位年龄为74岁(第25 - 75百分位数,69至82岁):50.1%为男性,34.9%患有至少一种基础疾病,30.7%有侵袭性肺炎球菌感染风险。在意向性分析中,多方面干预未改变肺炎球菌疫苗接种率(6.4%对4.6%,绝对差异:1.8;95%CI:[-0.9至4.4];P = 0.19),而提高了流感疫苗接种率(52.1%对40.0%,绝对差异:12.1;95%CI:[2.4至21.8];P = 0.01)。在12个月时,干预组(9.7%)和对照组(11.2%)的死亡率无差异(P = 0.35)。
基于短信提醒的多方面干预为增加到急诊科就诊的老年患者的抗流感疫苗接种提供了机会。有必要做出努力,以更好地提供关于肺炎球菌疾病及肺炎球菌疫苗益处的信息,尤其是针对老年人。