Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Disease Prevention and Control, Rui Jin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Crit Care. 2021 Sep 27;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03774-4.
Septic shock is characterized by an uncontrolled inflammatory response and microcirculatory dysfunction. There is currently no specific agent for treating septic shock. Anisodamine is an agent extracted from traditional Chinese medicine with potent anti-inflammatory effects. However, its clinical effectiveness remains largely unknown.
In a multicentre, open-label trial, we randomly assigned adults with septic shock to receive either usual care or anisodamine (0.1-0.5 mg per kilogram of body weight per hour), with the anisodamine doses adjusted by clinicians in accordance with the patients' shock status. The primary end point was death on hospital discharge. The secondary end points were ventilator-free days at 28 days, vasopressor-free days at 28 days, serum lactate and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from days 0 to 6. The differences in the primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the treatment and usual care groups with the χ test, Student's t test or rank-sum test, as appropriate. The false discovery rate was controlled for multiple testing.
Of the 469 patients screened, 355 were assigned to receive the trial drug and were included in the analyses-181 patients received anisodamine, and 174 were in the usual care group. We found no difference between the usual care and anisodamine groups in hospital mortality (36% vs. 30%; p = 0.348), or ventilator-free days (median [Q1, Q3], 24.4 [5.9, 28] vs. 26.0 [8.5, 28]; p = 0.411). The serum lactate levels were significantly lower in the treated group than in the usual care group after day 3. Patients in the treated group were less likely to receive vasopressors than those in the usual care group (OR [95% CI] 0.84 [0.50, 0.93] for day 5 and 0.66 [0.37, 0.95] for day 6).
There is no evidence that anisodamine can reduce hospital mortality among critically ill adults with septic shock treated in the intensive care unit. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02442440 ; Registered on 13 April 2015).
感染性休克的特征为失控性炎症反应和微循环功能障碍。目前,尚无治疗感染性休克的特效药物。山莨菪碱是一种从中药中提取的药物,具有强大的抗炎作用。但其临床疗效尚不清楚。
在一项多中心、开放性试验中,我们将成年感染性休克患者随机分为常规治疗组或山莨菪碱组(每小时 0.1-0.5mg/kg 体重),山莨菪碱剂量由临床医生根据患者休克状态进行调整。主要终点为出院时的死亡。次要终点为 28 天时的无呼吸机天数、28 天时的无血管加压素天数、0 至 6 天的血清乳酸和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。采用 χ2 检验、t 检验或秩和检验比较治疗组和常规治疗组的主要和次要结局差异,适当时采用校正。对多重检验进行了假发现率控制。
在筛选的 469 名患者中,有 355 名患者接受了试验药物治疗,并纳入分析-181 名患者接受了山莨菪碱治疗,174 名患者接受了常规治疗。我们发现常规治疗组和山莨菪碱组的住院死亡率(36% vs. 30%;p=0.348)或无呼吸机天数(中位数[Q1,Q3],24.4[5.9,28] vs. 26.0[8.5,28];p=0.411)无差异。治疗组患者的血清乳酸水平在第 3 天后明显低于常规治疗组。与常规治疗组相比,治疗组患者接受血管加压素的可能性更低(第 5 天的 OR[95%CI]为 0.84[0.50,0.93],第 6 天的 OR[95%CI]为 0.66[0.37,0.95])。
没有证据表明山莨菪碱可以降低 ICU 中接受治疗的重症成人感染性休克患者的住院死亡率。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02442440;于 2015 年 4 月 13 日注册)。