• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏病学操作的医院同意书是否符合健康素养标准?可理解性和可读性评估。

Do hospital consent forms for cardiology procedures meet health literacy standards? Evaluation of understandability and readability.

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1254-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.027
PMID:34579996
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Consent forms that are difficult to understand may jeopardize informed consent. The aim of this study was to determine whether consent documents for cardiology-related procedures could be easily read and understood by patients with low health literacy.

METHODS

All 37 cardiology-related consent forms with patient information material were retrieved from a publicly available suite of documents from one state in Australia. Two raters independently assessed documents and resolved discrepancies through discussion. Understandability was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printed materials (PEMAT-P). Readability was assessed using the Gunning Fog Index, SMOG and Flesch Reading Ease formulas. Images were assessed using the 5C Image checklist. Results were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Only 1 of 37 forms met the general PEMAT-P threshold (70%) for being 'understandable'. The average readability score was high, requiring a grade 10-12 level of education to understand. Most images lacked useful captions, had low visual clarity, and were not purpose-designed for the material.

CONCLUSIONS

The current format for cardiology consent forms does not meet recommended standards for understandability and readability.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Development of consent forms would benefit from taking health literacy principles into account with patient input, and purpose-designed images should be included in all forms to reinforce text.

摘要

目的

难以理解的知情同意书可能会危及知情同意。本研究旨在确定低健康素养的患者是否能够轻松阅读和理解与心脏病学相关的程序的知情同意书。

方法

从澳大利亚一个州的公开可用文档套件中检索了所有 37 份与心脏病学相关的同意书和患者信息材料。两名评估者独立评估文件,并通过讨论解决差异。使用印刷材料患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-P)评估理解性。使用 Gunning Fog 指数、SMOG 和 Flesch 阅读舒适度公式评估可读性。使用 5C 图像清单评估图像。结果以描述性方式进行分析。

结果

只有 37 份表格中的 1 份符合“可理解”的一般 PEMAT-P 标准(70%)。平均可读性得分较高,需要 10-12 年级的教育程度才能理解。大多数图像缺乏有用的标题,视觉清晰度低,并且不是为该材料专门设计的。

结论

目前心脏病学同意书的格式不符合可理解性和可读性的推荐标准。

实践意义

在制定同意书时,考虑到健康素养原则并征求患者的意见,将受益于患者的投入,并且应该在所有表格中包含专门设计的图像,以加强文本。

相似文献

1
Do hospital consent forms for cardiology procedures meet health literacy standards? Evaluation of understandability and readability.心脏病学操作的医院同意书是否符合健康素养标准?可理解性和可读性评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1254-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
3
Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.侵入性操作同意书的可读性。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):830-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12364. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.南非开展的研究性医学临床试验知情同意书的可读性。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Feb 1;111(2):180-183. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14752.
5
Readability and understandability of clinical research patient information leaflets and consent forms in Ireland and the UK: a retrospective quantitative analysis.爱尔兰和英国临床研究患者信息手册及同意书的可读性与可理解性:一项回顾性定量分析
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e037994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037994.
6
How readable are orthognathic surgery consent forms?正颌手术同意书的可读性如何?
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100689. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100689. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
7
Is There a Difference Between the Readabilities of Informed Consent Forms Used for Elective and Emergency Procedures in Turkey?土耳其用于选择性和急诊手术的知情同意书的可读性是否存在差异?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 May;54(3):626-630. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00096-0. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
8
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
9
Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.向谷歌医生咨询:关于鼓膜置管术的在线资源质量
Laryngoscope. 2018 Feb;128(2):496-501. doi: 10.1002/lary.26824. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
10
Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.明白了吗?评估鼻用皮质类固醇给药说明的可读性和易懂性。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Jun;10(6):773-778. doi: 10.1002/alr.22550. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus regarding transoral robotic surgery (TORS) complications for use in a proposed standardised consent form.关于经口机器人手术(TORS)并发症在拟议的标准化知情同意书中使用的共识。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 15;19(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02389-z.
2
Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Medical and Surgical Clinical Procedures: A Systematic Review.医疗和外科临床操作知情同意书的可读性:一项系统评价
Clin Pract. 2025 Jan 24;15(2):26. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15020026.
3
Readability and Comprehension of Anesthesia Informed Consent Forms in a Spanish County Hospital: An Observational Study.
西班牙一家县级医院麻醉知情同意书的可读性与理解性:一项观察性研究
Nurs Rep. 2024 May 24;14(2):1338-1352. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020101.
4
Helping patient educators meet health literacy needs: End-user testing and iterative development of an innovative health literacy editing tool.帮助患者教育者满足健康素养需求:创新型健康素养编辑工具的终端用户测试与迭代开发
PEC Innov. 2023 May 9;2:100162. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100162. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Alternative Means of Informed Consent in Cardiology: Strategies and Effectiveness in a Group of Italian Patients.心脏病学中知情同意的替代方式:一组意大利患者的策略与效果
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 19;13(5):430. doi: 10.3390/bs13050430.
6
Implementing patient decision aids into general practice clinical decision support systems: Feasibility study in cardiovascular disease prevention.将患者决策辅助工具纳入全科医疗临床决策支持系统:心血管疾病预防的可行性研究
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 21;2:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100140. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Information Needs and Communication Strategies for People with Coronary Heart Disease: A Scoping Review.冠心病患者的信息需求和沟通策略:综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031723.
8
Decision Support Tools for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Do Not Meet Health Literacy Needs: A Systematic Environmental Scan and Evaluation.用于心血管疾病一级预防的冠状动脉钙化评分的决策支持工具不符合健康素养需求:系统的环境扫描和评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;19(18):11705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811705.