Suppr超能文献

预防 COVID-19 疾病的药物干预措施:快速综述。

Pharmacological interventions to prevent Covid-19 disease: A rapid review.

机构信息

Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Rev Med Virol. 2022 May;32(3):e2299. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2299. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Abstract

The aim of this rapid review was to determine the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions (excluding vaccines) to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) or reduce the severity of disease. A systematic search of published peer-reviewed articles and non-peer-reviewed pre-prints was undertaken from 1 January 2020 to 17 August 2021. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-RCT were included; three trials (two RCTs and one non-RCT) tested ivermectin with or without carrageenan. While all reported some potential protective effect of ivermectin, these trials had a high risk of bias and the certainty of evidence was deemed to be 'very low'. One RCT tested bamlanivimab compared to placebo and reported a significantly reduced incidence of Covid-19 in the intervention group; this trial had a low risk of bias however the certainty of evidence was deemed 'very low'. The fifth RCT tested casirivimab plus imdevimab versus placebo and reported that the combination of monoclonal antibodies significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, viral load, duration of symptomatic disease and the duration of a high viral load; this trial was deemed to have a low risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence was 'low'. The designations 'low' and 'very low' regarding the certainty of evidence indicate that the estimate of effect is uncertain and therefore is unsuitable for informing decision-making. At the time of writing, there is insufficient high quality evidence to support the use of pharmacological interventions to prevent Covid-19.

摘要

本快速综述旨在确定药物干预(不包括疫苗)预防 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)或减轻疾病严重程度的效果。从 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 17 日,对已发表的同行评议文章和非同行评议预印本进行了系统检索。共纳入四项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项非 RCT;三项试验(两项 RCT 和一项非 RCT)测试了伊维菌素联合或不联合卡拉胶。虽然所有试验都报告了伊维菌素具有一定的潜在保护作用,但这些试验存在较高的偏倚风险,证据确定性被认为是“极低”。一项 RCT 比较了巴伦珠单抗与安慰剂,报告称干预组 COVID-19 的发病率显著降低;该试验的偏倚风险较低,但证据确定性被认为是“极低”。第五项 RCT 测试了 casirivimab 和 imdevimab 联合用药与安慰剂的比较,报告称联合使用单克隆抗体可显著降低有症状和无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染、病毒载量、有症状疾病持续时间和高病毒载量持续时间的发生率;该试验被认为偏倚风险低,证据确定性为“低”。证据确定性的“低”和“极低”评级表明,效果估计不确定,因此不适合用于决策。在撰写本文时,尚无足够的高质量证据支持使用药物干预来预防 COVID-19。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Subcutaneous REGEN-COV Antibody Combination to Prevent Covid-19.皮下注射 REGEN-COV 抗体组合以预防 COVID-19。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1184-1195. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2109682. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验