Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4th floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, CF14 4YS, Cardiff, UK.
PRIME Centre Wales, Wales, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 27;22(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03395-8.
People living in care homes have experienced devastating impact from COVID-19. As interventions to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 are developed and evaluated, there is an urgent need for researchers to agree on the outcomes used when evaluating their effectiveness. Having an agreed set of outcomes that are used in all relevant trials can ensure that study results can be compared.
The aim of the study was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for trials assessing the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for preventing COVID-19 infection and transmission in care homes.
The study used established COS methodology. A list of candidate outcomes was identified by reviewing registered trials to evaluate interventions to prevent COVID-19 in care homes. Seventy key stakeholders participated in a Delphi survey, rating the candidate outcomes on a nine-point scale over two rounds, with the opportunity to propose additional outcomes. Stakeholders included care home representatives (n = 19), healthcare professionals (n = 20), people with personal experience of care homes (n = 7), researchers (n = 15) and others (n = 9). Outcomes were eligible for inclusion if they met an a priori threshold. A consensus meeting with stakeholders resulted in agreement of the final outcome set.
Following the Delphi and consensus meeting, twenty-four outcomes were recommended for inclusion. These are grouped across four domains of infection, severity of illness, mortality, and 'other' (intervention specific or life impact). Due to the considerable heterogeneity between care homes, residents, and interventions, the relevance and importance of outcomes may differ between trial contexts. Intervention-specific outcomes would be included only where relevant to a given trial, thus reducing the measurement burden.
Using a rapid response approach, a COS for COVID-19 prevention interventions in care homes has been developed. Future work should focus on identifying instruments for measuring these outcomes, and the interpretation and application of the COS across different trial contexts. Beyond COVID-19, the outcomes identified in this COS may have relevance to other infectious diseases in care homes, and the rapid response approach may be useful as preparation for future pandemics.
居住在养老院的人群受到了 COVID-19 的严重影响。随着预防 COVID-19 传播的干预措施的制定和评估,研究人员急需就评估其有效性时使用的结果达成一致意见。达成一套在所有相关试验中使用的通用结果,可以确保可以比较研究结果。
本研究旨在为评估预防养老院 COVID-19 感染和传播的药物和非药物干预措施有效性的试验制定核心结局集(COS)。
本研究采用了已建立的 COS 方法。通过审查已注册的试验,评估预防养老院 COVID-19 的干预措施,确定候选结局列表。70 名关键利益相关者参与了两轮九分制 Delphi 调查,对候选结局进行评分,并提供了提出其他结局的机会。利益相关者包括养老院代表(n=19)、医疗保健专业人员(n=20)、有养老院个人经历的人(n=7)、研究人员(n=15)和其他人(n=9)。如果符合事先设定的阈值,则该结局符合纳入标准。与利益相关者举行共识会议,以达成最终结局集的协议。
经过 Delphi 和共识会议,建议纳入 24 个结局。这些结局分为感染、疾病严重程度、死亡率和“其他”(干预特异性或生活影响)四个领域。由于养老院、居民和干预措施之间存在相当大的异质性,因此不同试验背景下结局的相关性和重要性可能不同。只有在与特定试验相关的情况下才会纳入干预特异性结局,从而减轻测量负担。
使用快速反应方法制定了养老院 COVID-19 预防干预措施的 COS。未来的工作应侧重于确定测量这些结局的工具,以及在不同试验背景下对 COS 的解释和应用。除 COVID-19 之外,本 COS 中确定的结局可能与养老院中的其他传染病有关,并且这种快速反应方法可能有助于为未来的大流行做准备。