Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Neurology and Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021 Oct;91:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
There are no widely accepted criteria to aid the physician in diagnosing BSP.
To validate recently proposed diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm in a larger and geographically diverse population and to develop a screening system for blepharospasm.
Video-recordings from 211 blepharospasm patients and 166 healthy/disease controls were examined by 8 raters. Agreement for presence of orbicularis oculi spasms, sensory trick, and increased blinking was measured by k statistics. Inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms was asked by the examiner but not captured in the video. Patients/controls were also requested to fill a self-administered questionnaire addressing relevant blepharospasm clinical aspects. The diagnosis at each site was the gold standard for sensitivity/specificity.
All the study items yielded satisfactory inter/intra-observer agreement. Combination of items rather than each item alone reached satisfactory sensitivity/specificity. The combined algorithm started with recognition of spasms followed by sensory trick. In the absence of a sensory trick, including "increased blinking" or "inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms" or both items yielded 88-92% sensitivity and 79-83% specificity. No single question of the questionnaire yielded high sensitivity/specificity. Serial application of the questionnaire to our blepharospasm and control subjects and subsequent clinical examination of subjects screening positive by the validated diagnostic algorithms yielded 78-81% sensitivity and 83-91% specificity.
These results support the use of proposed diagnostic criteria in multi-ethnic, multi-center cohorts. We also propose a case-finding procedure to screen blepharospasm in a given population with less effort than would be required by examination of all subjects.
目前尚没有被广泛接受的标准来辅助医生诊断 BSP。
在更大的、地域分布更广泛的人群中验证近期提出的眼睑痉挛诊断标准,并开发眼睑痉挛的筛查系统。
8 位评估者对 211 例眼睑痉挛患者和 166 例健康/疾病对照者的视频记录进行了检查。采用 k 统计量衡量眼轮匝肌痉挛、感觉触发和眨眼增加的存在的观察者间和观察者内一致性。评估者询问患者是否能够自主抑制痉挛,但未在视频中捕捉。患者/对照者还填写了一份自我管理的问卷,其中涉及相关的眼睑痉挛临床方面。每个地点的诊断均为敏感性/特异性的金标准。
所有研究项目均产生了令人满意的观察者间/观察者内一致性。与每项研究项目单独相比,各项研究项目的组合达到了令人满意的敏感性/特异性。联合算法首先识别痉挛,然后识别感觉触发。如果没有感觉触发,包括“眨眼增加”或“无法自主抑制痉挛”或同时包括这两项,则敏感性为 88-92%,特异性为 79-83%。问卷中没有单一问题能达到较高的敏感性/特异性。对我们的眼睑痉挛和对照者进行连续应用问卷调查,并对通过验证的诊断算法筛查阳性的患者进行后续临床检查,敏感性为 78-81%,特异性为 83-91%。
这些结果支持在多民族、多中心队列中使用拟议的诊断标准。我们还提出了一种病例发现程序,以便在特定人群中筛查眼睑痉挛,其所需的工作量要少于对所有受试者进行检查。