Tharakan Abraham
Department of Nephrology, SH Medical Centre, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Indian J Nephrol. 2021 Jul-Aug;31(4):398-401. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_231_20. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Acute anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions to dialyzers are uncommon. Indeed, they are thought to have decreased in incidence since the transition to more biocompatible dialyzer membranes and with the abandonment of ethylene oxide for sterilization of dialyzers. However, few recent Spanish studies suggest that the incidence actually remains the same. Here, we report two cases of dialyzer first use reactions that occurred with polysulfone dialyzers. These were not ethylene oxide sterilized dialyzers and the reactions were less intense/absent from the second reuse onwards. Both the patients were successfully dialyzed by switching to a cellulose triacetate dialyzer or by using a preprocessed dialyzer filled with renalin. Thus, the cause of the reaction could either be the primary polysulfone membrane or a leachable substance from the dialyzer.
对透析器的急性过敏/类过敏反应并不常见。事实上,自转向使用生物相容性更高的透析器膜以及不再使用环氧乙烷对透析器进行消毒以来,人们认为此类反应的发生率已经下降。然而,最近的一些西班牙研究表明,实际发生率仍保持不变。在此,我们报告两例使用聚砜透析器时发生的首次使用透析器反应。这些透析器并非经环氧乙烷消毒,且从第二次复用开始反应强度减弱或未再出现。通过改用三醋酸纤维素透析器或使用填充有Renalin的预处理透析器,两名患者均成功进行了透析。因此,反应的原因可能是聚砜原膜或透析器中的可浸出物质。