• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

厄瓜多尔的 EPD 问卷的开发和验证,一种糖尿病特异性的患者报告体验和结局测量工具:一项混合方法研究。

Development and validation in Ecuador of the EPD Questionnaire, a diabetes-specific patient-reported experience and outcome measure: A mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Atenea Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research, Alicante, Spain.

Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2134-2146. doi: 10.1111/hex.13366. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13366
PMID:34585477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9615093/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The global prevalence of diabetes in 2019 in adults was estimated to be 9.3%. This study developed in Ecuador, for the first time, instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes and experiences.

METHODS

The Experiences of the Person with Diabetes (EPD) Questionnaire is a diabetes-specific instrument. A mixed-methods study was conducted. First, a qualitative item development phase that included four focus groups and six semi-structured interviews with patients was conducted in different rural and urban areas of Ecuador to obtain information on culture, beliefs, demographics, diet and social perspectives. A second quantitative phase for psychometric validation was carried out in primary care settings of rural and urban areas of Ecuador.

RESULTS

Forty-two and four hundred and eighty-nine participants were included in each phase, respectively. The item development phase resulted in a questionnaire of 44 items (23 for perceived outcomes and 21 for experiences). In the validation study, most participants were women (58%) and from urban areas (57%). Exploratory factor analysis revealed three dimensions for each instrument. Outcomes instrument dimensions were symptoms and burnout, worries and fears and social limitations. Experiences instrument dimensions were information, patient-centred care and care delivery. Cronbach's α values of the total score and dimensions were high, ranging between .81 and .93 in both instruments. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit of the data.

CONCLUSION

The EPD Questionnaire is probably the first instrument developed to assess patient-reported experiences and perceived outcomes in a middle-income country that included patients to capture all dimensions relevant for the intended population. Its psychometric properties are robust and could provide valuable information for clinicians and policymakers in the region.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The development of these instruments has taken into consideration patients and the public since their conception. A qualitative approach gathered relevant information related to the cultural, social and economic burden of different populations in Ecuador. Before validation, a pilot test was carried out with users of the National Health Services to obtain their perspectives and insights of the developed instrument. Finally, during the data analysis, we have given special consideration to social variables such as rural and urban populations.

摘要

简介

2019 年,全球成年人糖尿病患病率估计为 9.3%。本研究在厄瓜多尔首次开发了评估患者报告结局和体验的工具。

方法

体验糖尿病患者问卷(EPD)是一种专门针对糖尿病的工具。本研究采用混合方法进行。首先,在厄瓜多尔不同的农村和城市地区进行了为期四个焦点小组和六次半结构化访谈的定性项目开发阶段,以获取有关文化、信仰、人口统计学、饮食和社会观点的信息。其次,在厄瓜多尔农村和城市地区的初级保健环境中进行了心理测量验证的第二阶段。

结果

每个阶段分别纳入了 42 名和 489 名参与者。在项目开发阶段,产生了一个包含 44 个项目的问卷(23 个用于感知结果,21 个用于体验)。在验证研究中,大多数参与者为女性(58%)和来自城市地区(57%)。探索性因子分析显示,每个工具都有三个维度。结局工具维度为症状和倦怠、担忧和恐惧以及社会限制。体验工具维度为信息、以患者为中心的护理和护理提供。两个工具的总分和维度的克朗巴赫 α 值均较高,均在 0.81 到 0.93 之间。验证性因子分析显示数据拟合良好。

结论

EPD 问卷可能是第一个在中低收入国家开发的评估患者报告体验和感知结局的工具,该工具纳入了患者,以捕捉目标人群中所有相关维度。其心理测量学特性稳健,可为该地区的临床医生和政策制定者提供有价值的信息。

患者或公众贡献

这些工具的开发从概念上就考虑到了患者和公众的需求。采用定性方法收集了厄瓜多尔不同人群的文化、社会和经济负担的相关信息。在验证之前,对国家卫生服务的使用者进行了试点测试,以获得他们对开发工具的看法和见解。最后,在数据分析过程中,我们特别考虑了农村和城市人口等社会变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/9615093/67189117afec/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/9615093/11e4ca87d3e7/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/9615093/67189117afec/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/9615093/11e4ca87d3e7/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9534/9615093/67189117afec/HEX-25--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation in Ecuador of the EPD Questionnaire, a diabetes-specific patient-reported experience and outcome measure: A mixed-methods study.厄瓜多尔的 EPD 问卷的开发和验证,一种糖尿病特异性的患者报告体验和结局测量工具:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2134-2146. doi: 10.1111/hex.13366. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
Adaptation and psychometric validation of Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18) in patients with type 2 diabetes in Quito, Ecuador: a cross-sectional study.厄瓜多尔基多 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病健康状况问卷(DHP-18)的适应和心理测量学验证:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 31;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01818-5.
3
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
4
Development and psychometric evaluation of the assessment of self-injection questionnaire: an adaptation of the self-injection assessment questionnaire.自我注射问卷评估的开发与心理测量学评价:自我注射评估问卷的改编版
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 4;18(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01606-7.
5
Development and Preliminary Validation of an Instrument to Measure Symptoms and Impacts in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.增生型糖尿病视网膜病变患者症状与影响评估工具的编制与初步验证。
Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1773-1786. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02447-8. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
The development and structural validity testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Care (PCPI-C).《以人为本实践量表-关怀版》的编制与结构有效性检验。
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0303158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303158. eCollection 2024.
7
Development and validation of a questionnaire to determine medical orders non-adherence: a sequential exploratory mixed-method study.制定和验证用于确定医疗医嘱不遵从性的问卷:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06147-3.
8
How to measure experiences of healthcare quality in Denmark among patients with heart disease? The development and psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported instrument.如何衡量丹麦心脏病患者的医疗质量体验?一种患者报告工具的开发与心理测量评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 30;7(10):e016234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016234.
9
Development and psychometric evaluation of TEXP-Q: a questionnaire measuring transition and transfer experiences in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes.TEXp-Q 的制定与心理计量评估:一个用于测量青少年 1 型糖尿病患者过渡和转归体验的问卷。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Nov 8;7(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00652-1.
10
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruments for assessing patient-reported experience measures among patients with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review.评估糖尿病患者自我报告体验指标的工具:一项范围综述
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Feb 8;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00848-7.
2
Implications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures among patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes.初诊 2 型糖尿病患者的患者报告结局测量的意义。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00592-1.
3
Evaluating Staff Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors Related to Cyber Security in Large Australian Health Care Environments: Mixed Methods Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in People Living with Diabetes: A Scoping Review of Instruments.糖尿病患者报告的体验和结局测量指标:工具的范围综述。
Patient. 2021 Nov;14(6):759-773. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00526-y. Epub 2021 May 27.
2
The impact of COVID-19 on chronic care according to providers: a qualitative study among primary care practices in Belgium.COVID-19 对慢性病护理的影响:比利时初级保健实践中的一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Dec 5;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01326-3.
3
Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: an analysis from 1990 to 2025.
评估大型澳大利亚医疗保健环境中与网络安全相关的员工态度、意图和行为:混合方法研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 4;10:e48220. doi: 10.2196/48220.
4
Validation of a scale to assess adherence to oral chemotherapy based on the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals (EXPAD-ANEO).基于患者和医护人员经验的口服化疗依从性评估量表(EXPAD-ANEO)的验证
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1113898. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1113898. eCollection 2023.
5
What is important for people with type 2 diabetes? A focus group study to identify relevant aspects for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in diabetes care.对于 2 型糖尿病患者来说,什么是重要的?一项焦点小组研究,旨在确定糖尿病护理中患者报告结局测量的相关方面。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 14;17(11):e0277424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277424. eCollection 2022.
6
Disrupting patterns of exclusion in participatory spaces: Involving people from vulnerable populations.打破参与空间中的排斥模式:让弱势群体参与进来。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2031-2033. doi: 10.1111/hex.13578. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
全球、地区和国家 195 个国家和地区的糖尿病负担和趋势:1990 年至 2025 年的分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 8;10(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71908-9.
4
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting.在初级保健环境中,以患者为中心的护理和护理共同创造对于满足多病症患者的护理满意度以及身体和社会幸福感的重要性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ).糖尿病注射装置体验问卷(DID-EQ)和糖尿病注射装置偏好问卷(DID-PQ)的心理测量学评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 19;2:44. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0064-3. eCollection 2018 Dec.
7
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
8
Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing Patient Experience of Chronic Illness Care.一种用于评估慢性病护理患者体验的工具的开发与验证
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 31;16(3):13. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2443.
9
Identifying Primary Care Pathways from Quality of Care to Outcomes and Satisfaction Using Structural Equation Modeling.利用结构方程模型从医疗质量到结局和满意度识别初级保健途径。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):430-449. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12666. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
10
What is important for you? A qualitative interview study of living with diabetes and experiences of diabetes care to establish a basis for a tailored Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Swedish National Diabetes Register.对你来说什么是重要的?一项关于糖尿病患者生活及糖尿病护理体验的定性访谈研究,旨在为瑞典国家糖尿病登记处制定一份量身定制的患者报告结局测量指标奠定基础。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 24;6(3):e010249. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010249.