• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德语文本中用于治疗非特异性下腰痛的移动医疗应用程序的可用性、质量和基于证据的内容:系统评估。

Availability, Quality, and Evidence-Based Content of mHealth Apps for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the German Language: Systematic Assessment.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, City University of Applied Sciences Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 13;11:e47502. doi: 10.2196/47502.

DOI:10.2196/47502
PMID:37703072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10534285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) carries significant socioeconomic relevance and leads to substantial difficulties for those who are affected by it. The effectiveness of app-based treatments has been confirmed, and clinicians are recommended to use such interventions. As 88.8% of the German population uses smartphones, apps could support therapy. The available apps in mobile app stores are poorly regulated, and their quality can vary. Overviews of the availability and quality of mobile apps for Australia, Great Britain, and Spain have been compiled, but this has not yet been done for Germany.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to provide an overview of the availability and content-related quality of apps for the treatment of NSLBP in the German language.

METHODS

A systematic search for apps on iOS and Android was conducted on July 6, 2022, in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined before the search. Apps in the German language that were available in both stores were eligible. To check for evidence, the apps found were assessed using checklists based on the German national guideline for NSLBP and the British equivalent of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The quality of the apps was measured using the Mobile Application Rating Scale. To control potential inaccuracies, a second reviewer resurveyed the outcomes for 30% (3/8) of the apps and checked the inclusion and exclusion criteria for these apps. The outcomes, measured using the assessment tools, are presented in tables with descriptive statistics. Furthermore, the characteristics of the included apps were summarized.

RESULTS

In total, 8 apps were included for assessment. Features provided with different frequencies were exercise tracking of prefabricated or adaptable workout programs, educational aspects, artificial intelligence-based therapy or workout programs, and motion detection. All apps met some recommendations by the German national guideline and used forms of exercises as recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline. The mean value of items rated as "Yes" was 5.75 (SD 2.71) out of 16. The best-rated app received an answer of "Yes" for 11 items. The mean Mobile Application Rating Scale quality score was 3.61 (SD 0.55). The highest mean score was obtained in "Section B-Functionality" (mean 3.81, SD 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Available apps in the German language meet guideline recommendations and are mostly of acceptable or good quality. Their use as a therapy supplement could help promote the implementation of home-based exercise protocols. A new assessment tool to obtain ratings on apps for the treatment of NSLBP, combining aspects of quality and evidence-based best practices, could be useful.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework Registries sq435; https://osf.io/sq435.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3cb/10534285/42743da7171d/mhealth_v11i1e47502_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3cb/10534285/b7a3d749de0b/mhealth_v11i1e47502_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3cb/10534285/42743da7171d/mhealth_v11i1e47502_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3cb/10534285/b7a3d749de0b/mhealth_v11i1e47502_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3cb/10534285/42743da7171d/mhealth_v11i1e47502_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)具有显著的社会经济学意义,给患者带来了巨大的困难。基于应用程序的治疗方法已被证实有效,临床医生被建议使用此类干预措施。由于 88.8%的德国人口使用智能手机,因此应用程序可以支持治疗。移动应用商店中的应用程序监管不力,质量参差不齐。已经对澳大利亚、英国和西班牙的移动应用程序的可用性和质量进行了综述,但尚未对德国进行综述。

目的

本研究旨在提供德国语言治疗 NSLBP 的应用程序的可用性和内容相关质量概述。

方法

于 2022 年 7 月 6 日在 iOS 和 Android 的苹果应用商店和谷歌播放商店中对应用程序进行了系统性搜索。在搜索之前定义了纳入和排除标准。在两个商店中都可用的德语应用程序符合入选条件。为了检查证据,使用基于德国非特异性下腰痛国家指南和英国国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence)等效物的检查表对找到的应用程序进行了评估。使用移动应用程序评级量表(Mobile Application Rating Scale)测量应用程序的质量。为了控制潜在的不准确,第二位评审员对 30%(3/8)的应用程序重新进行了评估,并检查了这些应用程序的纳入和排除标准。使用评估工具测量的结果以表格形式呈现,其中包括描述性统计数据。此外,还总结了纳入应用程序的特征。

结果

共有 8 个应用程序被纳入评估。不同频率提供的功能包括预制或可适应锻炼计划的运动追踪、教育方面、基于人工智能的治疗或锻炼计划以及运动检测。所有应用程序都符合德国国家指南的一些建议,并使用了国家卫生与保健卓越研究所指南推荐的锻炼形式。在 16 个项目中被评为“是”的平均值为 5.75(SD 2.71)。评分最高的应用程序获得了 11 个“是”的答案。移动应用程序评级量表的平均质量评分为 3.61(SD 0.55)。“B 节-功能”的平均得分最高(平均 3.81,SD 0.54)。

结论

德国语言的可用应用程序符合指南建议,且质量大多为可接受或良好。它们作为辅助治疗手段的使用可以帮助促进基于家庭的锻炼方案的实施。一种新的评估工具可以结合质量和基于最佳实践的证据,对治疗 NSLBP 的应用程序进行评分。

试验注册

开放科学框架注册 sq435;https://osf.io/sq435.

相似文献

1
Availability, Quality, and Evidence-Based Content of mHealth Apps for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the German Language: Systematic Assessment.德语文本中用于治疗非特异性下腰痛的移动医疗应用程序的可用性、质量和基于证据的内容:系统评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 13;11:e47502. doi: 10.2196/47502.
2
Assessing the accessibility and quality of mobile health applications for the treatment of obesity in the German healthcare market.评估德国医疗市场上用于治疗肥胖症的移动健康应用程序的可及性和质量。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jun 11;4:1393714. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1393714. eCollection 2024.
3
German Mobile Apps in Rheumatology: Review and Analysis Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).德国风湿病学移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)进行的评估与分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 5;7(8):e14991. doi: 10.2196/14991.
4
Effective German and English Language mHealth Apps for Self-management of Bronchial Asthma in Children and Adolescents: Comparison Study.有效德英双语移动医疗应用程序在儿童和青少年支气管哮喘自我管理中的应用:比较研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 19;9(5):e24907. doi: 10.2196/24907.
5
mHealth Apps for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.移动医疗应用程序在腰痛自我管理中的应用:应用商店中的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Feb 1;12:e53262. doi: 10.2196/53262.
6
Review and Analysis of German Mobile Apps for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.使用移动应用程序评级量表对德国炎症性肠病管理的移动应用程序进行回顾和分析:应用商店的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 3;10(5):e31102. doi: 10.2196/31102.
7
Patient-Centered Chronic Wound Care Mobile Apps: Systematic Identification, Analysis, and Assessment.以患者为中心的慢性伤口护理移动应用程序:系统识别、分析和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 21;12:e51592. doi: 10.2196/51592.
8
Functionality and Quality of Asthma mHealth Apps and Their Consistency With International Guidelines: Structured Search and Evaluation.哮喘移动医疗应用程序的功能和质量及其与国际指南的一致性:结构化搜索和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 10;12:e47295. doi: 10.2196/47295.
9
Assessment of the Quality of Mobile Applications (Apps) for Management of Low Back Pain Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估用于管理下腰痛的移动应用程序(Apps)的质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;17(24):9209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249209.
10
Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.移动应用程序用于常见非传染性疾病管理:在应用商店中的系统搜索和使用移动应用程序评级量表进行评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 12;12:e49055. doi: 10.2196/49055.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy of Multimodal Exercise Telerehabilitation Based on AI for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于人工智能的多模式运动远程康复治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的临床疗效:随机对照试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 May 22;13:e56176. doi: 10.2196/56176.
2
Mind your pain: A single-arm feasibility study to assess a smartphone-based interoceptive attention training for patients with chronic low back pain.关注你的疼痛:一项基于单臂的可行性研究,评估基于智能手机的内感受注意训练对慢性下腰痛患者的效果。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0307690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307690. eCollection 2024.
3
The Efficacy of the Smartphone App for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Their Quality through the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) in Italy.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Coaching for Low Back Pain and Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.健康教练在腰痛和髋、膝关节骨关节炎中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pain Med. 2023 Jan 4;24(1):32-51. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac099.
2
Availability, content and quality of commercially available smartphone applications for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic assessment.市售可用于自我管理下背痛的智能手机应用程序的可用性、内容和质量:系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(24):7600-7609. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1979664. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
3
Goal attainment scaling for patients with low back pain in rehabilitation: A systematic review.
智能手机应用程序用于下腰痛自我管理的疗效:意大利一项通过移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行的系统评价及其质量评估
Life (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;14(6):760. doi: 10.3390/life14060760.
4
Assessing the accessibility and quality of mobile health applications for the treatment of obesity in the German healthcare market.评估德国医疗市场上用于治疗肥胖症的移动健康应用程序的可及性和质量。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jun 11;4:1393714. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1393714. eCollection 2024.
康复中腰痛患者的目标达成标度法:一项系统评价。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 22;4(3):e378. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.378. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Effect of Home Exercise Training in Patients with Nonspecific Low-Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.家庭运动训练对非特异性下腰痛患者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 10;18(16):8430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168430.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
The catastrophization effects of an MRI report on the patient and surgeon and the benefits of 'clinical reporting': results from an RCT and blinded trials.MRI 报告对患者和外科医生的灾难化影响,以及“临床报告”的益处:来自 RCT 和盲法试验的结果。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jul;30(7):2069-2081. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06809-0. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
Assessment of the Quality of Mobile Applications (Apps) for Management of Low Back Pain Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)评估用于管理下腰痛的移动应用程序(Apps)的质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 9;17(24):9209. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249209.
8
Effects of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews.运动疗法对急性腰痛患者的影响:系统评价的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 14;9(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01412-8.
9
The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.修订后的国际疼痛研究协会疼痛定义:概念、挑战和妥协。
Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.
10
Less Pain, Better Sleep? The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Back Pain App on Sleep Quality in Individuals Suffering from Back Pain - a Secondary Analysis of App User Data.疼痛减轻,睡眠改善?一款多学科背痛应用程序对背痛患者睡眠质量的影响——应用程序用户数据的二次分析
J Pain Res. 2020 May 20;13:1121-1128. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S232792. eCollection 2020.