Dyer Brett P, Burton Claire, Rathod-Mistry Trishna, Blagojevic-Bucknall Milisa, van der Windt Danielle A
Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jul 14;3(3):100141. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100141. eCollection 2021 Sep.
To summarize evidence from longitudinal observational studies to determine whether diabetes (types 1 and 2) is associated with the course of symptoms in people with frozen shoulder.
A systematic literature search of 11 bibliographic databases (published through June 2021), reference screening, and emailing professional contacts.
Studies were selected if they had a longitudinal observational design that included people diagnosed with frozen shoulder at baseline and compared outcomes at follow-up (>2wk) among those with and without diabetes at baseline.
Data extraction was completed by 1 reviewer using a predefined extraction sheet and was checked by another reviewer. Two reviewers independently judged risk of bias using the Quality in Prognostic Factor Studies tool.
A narrative synthesis, including inspection of forest plots and use of the prognostic factor Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Twenty-eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Seven studies were judged to be at a moderate risk of bias and 21 at a high risk of bias. Diabetes was associated with worse multidimensional clinical scores (moderate certainty in evidence), worse pain (low certainty in evidence), and worse range of motion (very low certainty in evidence).
This review provides preliminary evidence to suggest that people with diabetes may experience worse outcomes from frozen shoulder than those without diabetes. If high-quality studies can confirm the findings of this review, then clinicians should monitor patients with frozen shoulder with diabetes more closely and offer further treatment if pain or lack of function persists long-term.
总结纵向观察性研究的证据,以确定糖尿病(1型和2型)是否与肩周炎患者的症状病程相关。
对11个文献数据库进行系统的文献检索(截至2021年6月发表)、参考文献筛选,并向专业联系人发送电子邮件。
如果研究采用纵向观察性设计,纳入基线时被诊断为肩周炎的患者,并比较基线时有糖尿病和无糖尿病患者在随访时(>2周)的结果,则选择该研究。
由1名审阅者使用预定义的提取表完成数据提取,并由另一名审阅者进行检查。两名审阅者使用预后因素研究质量工具独立判断偏倚风险。
进行叙述性综合分析,包括检查森林图和使用预后因素推荐分级、评估、制定和评价框架。28项研究符合纳入标准。7项研究被判定存在中度偏倚风险,21项研究被判定存在高度偏倚风险。糖尿病与更差的多维临床评分(证据确定性中等)、更严重的疼痛(证据确定性低)和更差的活动范围(证据确定性非常低)相关。
本综述提供了初步证据,表明糖尿病患者肩周炎的预后可能比非糖尿病患者更差。如果高质量研究能够证实本综述的结果,那么临床医生应该更密切地监测糖尿病肩周炎患者,如果疼痛或功能障碍长期持续,应提供进一步治疗。