Department of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
Institut de Neuroscience des Systemès, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 30;11(1):19530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98953-2.
The efficacy of rhythmic acoustic stimulation (RAS) to improve gait and balance in healthy elderly individuals is controversial. Our aim was to investigate, through 3D gait analysis, the effect of different types of RAS (fixed frequency and based on subject-specific cadence), using conventional gait parameters and the trunk displacement as readouts. Walking at a fixed frequency of 80 bpm, the subjects showed extended duration of gait cycle and increased gait variability while the same individuals, walking at a fixed frequency of 120 bpm, showed reduced trunk sway and gait cycle duration. With regard to the RAS at subject-specific frequencies, walking at 90% of the subject-specific average cadence did not significantly modify the gait parameters, except for the speed, which was reduced. In contrast, walking at 100% and 110% of the mean cadence caused increased stride length and a slight reduction of temporal parameters and trunk sway. In conclusion, this pilot study shows that using RAS at fixed frequencies might be an inappropriate strategy, as it is not adjusted to individual gait characteristics. On the other hand, RAS frequencies equal to or slightly higher than each subject's natural cadence seem to be beneficial for gait and stability.
节奏声刺激(RAS)对改善健康老年人步态和平衡的疗效存在争议。我们旨在通过 3D 步态分析,使用常规步态参数和躯干位移作为指标,研究不同类型的 RAS(固定频率和基于个体特定步频的 RAS)的效果。在 80 bpm 的固定频率下行走时,受试者的步态周期延长,步态变异性增加,而同一受试者在 120 bpm 的固定频率下行走时,躯干摆动和步态周期时间减少。至于特定个体频率的 RAS,以个体平均步频的 90%行走并没有显著改变步态参数,除了速度降低。相比之下,以个体平均步频的 100%和 110%行走会增加步幅,略微减少时间参数和躯干摆动。总之,这项初步研究表明,使用固定频率的 RAS 可能不是一种合适的策略,因为它不能根据个体的步态特征进行调整。另一方面,等于或略高于每个个体自然步频的 RAS 频率似乎有益于步态和稳定性。