• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AMCP 合作论坛:种族健康差异——深入探讨福利设计。

AMCP Partnership Forum: Racial health disparities-a closer look at benefit design.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):125-131. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21217. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2021.21217
PMID:34597158
Abstract

As part of its stand against racial injustice and its commitment to action, AMCP dedicated a partnership forum to discussion of potential sources of racial health disparities and inequities in benefit design because these are primary drivers of medication use. This forum, held virtually March 23-24, 2021, convened more than 40 experts representing key stakeholders from managed care settings. Key principles that emerged from the forum discussion as means to mitigate racial health disparities were to acknowledge that structural racism exists and that it can impact the provision of health care, including but not limited to formulary development and benefit design processes; to integrate proactive strategies to improve equity, beginning with education and training, into all aspects of health care; and to view patients holistically with an understanding of the compounding effect of social determinants of health on their personal wellness. With these principles in mind, participants highlighted several priority considerations including improving existing gaps in data, addressing diversity and equity as they relate to formulary development, evaluating systems such as benefit offerings through a lens of increasing equity, recognizing cost-related factors that affect equity, considering patients' interactions with and their ability to access the system, and committing to patient-centered care. Participants also suggested areas for policy-related focus and noted the need to develop and deploy specific education and training. This forum was sponsored by Amgen, the National Pharmaceutical Council, Pfizer, PhRMA, Sandoz, and Takeda. Their representatives joined the forum as panelists or participants. These proceedings were prepared as a summary of the forum to represent common themes; they are not necessarily endorsed by all attendees nor should they be construed as reflecting group consensus.

摘要

作为其反对种族不公正和承诺采取行动的一部分,AMCP 专门设立了一个合作论坛,讨论潜在的种族健康差异和福利设计中的不平等的根源,因为这些是药物使用的主要驱动因素。该论坛于 2021 年 3 月 23 日至 24 日以虚拟形式举行,召集了来自管理式医疗环境的 40 多名代表主要利益相关方的专家。论坛讨论中出现的缓解种族健康差异的关键原则包括承认结构性种族主义的存在,以及它可能影响医疗保健的提供,包括但不限于处方集开发和福利设计流程;将积极主动的战略纳入医疗保健的各个方面,以改善公平,从教育和培训开始;以及从整体上看待患者,了解健康决定因素对他们个人健康的综合影响。考虑到这些原则,与会者强调了几个优先考虑的事项,包括缩小现有数据差距,解决与处方集开发相关的多样性和公平问题,通过增加公平性的视角评估福利等系统,认识到影响公平的与成本相关的因素,考虑患者与系统的互动及其获取系统的能力,并致力于以患者为中心的护理。与会者还提出了政策相关重点领域,并指出需要制定和部署具体的教育和培训。本次论坛由安进、国家药品理事会、辉瑞、PhRMA、山德士和武田赞助。他们的代表作为小组成员或参与者参加了论坛。这些记录是作为论坛的总结编写的,以代表共同的主题;它们不一定得到所有与会者的认可,也不应被解释为反映小组共识。

相似文献

1
AMCP Partnership Forum: Racial health disparities-a closer look at benefit design.AMCP 合作论坛:种族健康差异——深入探讨福利设计。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan;28(1):125-131. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21217. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
2
AMCP Partnership Forum: What's Next for Specialty Medication Benefit Design and Reimbursement.AMCP合作论坛:专科药物福利设计与报销的下一步走向
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1206-1213. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20121. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
AMCP Partnership Forum: FDAMA Section 114-Improving the Exchange of Health Care Economic Data.AMCP 合作论坛:FDAMA 第 114 节——改善医疗保健经济数据的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jul;22(7):826-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.7.826.
4
AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?AMCP 合作论坛:数字疗法——它们是什么,以及它们在药学和医疗福利中的定位是什么?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19418. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
AMCP Partnership Forum: Optimizing Prior Authorization for Appropriate Medication Selection.AMCP 合作论坛:优化适当药物选择的预先授权。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):55-62. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.55.
6
AMCP Partnership Forum: Principles for Sound Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Committee Practices: What's Next?AMCP 合作论坛:合理的药学和治疗学(P&T)委员会实践原则:下一步是什么?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):48-53. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.48.
7
AMCP Partnership Forum: Helping patients anticipate and manage drug costs.AMCP 合作论坛:帮助患者预测和管理药品费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jan;27(1):127-132. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20239. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
8
AMCP Partnership Forum: Managing Total Cost of Care Through Medical and Pharmacy Data Integration.AMCP合作论坛:通过医疗与药学数据整合管理医疗总费用
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Mar;25(3):292-299. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19004. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
AMCP Partnership Forum: Advancing Value-Based Contracting.AMCP 合作论坛:推进基于价值的合同。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Nov;23(11):1096-1102. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17342. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
AMCP Partnership Forum: Enabling the Exchange of Clinical and Economic Information Pre-FDA Approval.AMCP 合作论坛:在 FDA 批准前实现临床和经济信息的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):105-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16366. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing disparities in medication use: Responding to managed care pharmacy's imperatives.减少药物使用差距:应对管理式医疗保健药房的当务之急。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jul;30(7):747-751. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.747.
2
Racial and social inequities in medication use: A review of articles responding to the + 's Call to Action.药物使用中的种族和社会不平等:回应 + 行动呼吁的文章综述。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jul;30(7):736-746. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.736.
3
Combining zip code-based population data and pharmacy administrative claims data to create measures of social determinants of health.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial disparities in medication use: imperatives for managed care pharmacy.药物使用中的种族差异:管理式医疗药学的当务之急。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Nov;26(11):1468-1474. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.11.1468.
2
Racial Disparities in Medication Use: Response and Call for Submissions.种族用药差异:回应与投稿呼吁。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Nov;26(11):1475-1476. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.11.1475.
3
Significant Disparities Exist in Consumer Health Insurance Literacy: Implications for Health Care Reform.消费者健康保险素养存在显著差异:对医疗保健改革的影响。
利用邮政编码人口数据和药房管理索赔数据来创建健康社会决定因素的衡量指标。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Apr;30(4):364-375. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.364.
4
A primer on managed care pharmacy.管理式医疗药学概论。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Dec;29(12):1371-1376. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.12.1371.
5
Physician perceptions of drug utilization management: Results of a national survey.医生对药物利用管理的看法:全国性调查结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 20;17(9):e0274772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274772. eCollection 2022.
6
Advancing a managed care pharmacy research agenda: Generating real-world evidence to support US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approvals and improving benefit design to address health inequities.推进管理式医疗药学研究议程:生成真实世界证据以支持美国食品和药物管理局的加速审批,并改善受益设计以解决健康不平等问题。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Aug;28(8):911-917. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22049. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Nov 5;3(4):e250-e258. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190923-01. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Exploring Racism and Health: An Intensive Interactive Session for Medical Students.探索种族主义与健康:面向医学生的强化互动课程
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Dec 14;14:10783. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10783.
5
Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.疼痛评估与治疗建议中的种族偏见,以及对黑人和白人之间生物学差异的错误认知。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4296-301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516047113. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener's tale.种族主义的层次:一个理论框架和一个园丁的故事。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Aug;90(8):1212-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1212.