• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估三种国际指南在识别胰腺囊肿恶性肿瘤风险中的准确性:一项外科治疗人群的回顾性分析。

Evaluating the accuracy of three international guidelines in identifying the risk of malignancy in pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of a surgical treated population.

机构信息

Department of gastroenterology and hepatology, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, UZ Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Jul-Sep;84(3):443-450. doi: 10.51821/84.3.006.

DOI:10.51821/84.3.006
PMID:34599569
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The international consensus Fukuoka guideline (Fukuoka ICG), The European evidence-based guideline on pancreatic cystic neoplasms (European EBG) and the American Gastroenterological Association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts (AGA IG) are 3 frequently cited guidelines for the risk stratification of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of detecting malignant cysts by strictly applying these guidelines retrospectively to a cohort of surgically resected pancreatic cysts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

72 resected cysts were included in the analysis. Invasive carcinoma, high grade dysplasia and neuro-endocrine tumour were considered as "malignant cysts" for the purpose of the study.

RESULTS

32% of the resected cysts were malignant. The analysis showed that the Fukuoka ICG, European EBG and AGA IG had a sensitivity of 66,8%, 95,5%, 80%; a specificity of 26,8%, 11,3%, 43,8%; a positive predictive value of 31,8%, 35%, 47,1% and a negative predicted value of 61,1%, 83,3%, 77,8% respectively. The missed malignancy rate was respectively 11,3%, 1,5%, 7,7% and surgical overtreatment was respectively 48,4%, 59,1%, 34,6%.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, the European EBG had the lowest rate of missed malignancy at the expense of a high number of "unnecessary" resections. The Fukuoka ICG had the highest number of missed malignancy. The AGA IG showed the lowest rate of unnecessary surgery at the cost of a high number of missed malignancy. There is need to develop better biomarkers to predict the risk of malignancy.

摘要

背景与研究目的

国际福冈指南(福冈 ICG)、欧洲胰腺囊性肿瘤循证指南(欧洲 EBG)和美国胃肠病学会胰腺无症状肿瘤性囊肿诊治指南(AGA IG)是 3 项常用于胰腺肿瘤性囊肿危险分层的指南。本研究旨在严格按照这些指南回顾性评估其对手术切除的胰腺囊肿队列中恶性囊肿的检出准确性。

患者与方法

纳入 72 例切除的囊肿进行分析。侵袭性癌、高级别异型增生和神经内分泌肿瘤被视为研究目的的“恶性囊肿”。

结果

32%的切除囊肿为恶性。分析表明,福冈 ICG、欧洲 EBG 和 AGA IG 的灵敏度分别为 66.8%、95.5%和 80%;特异性分别为 26.8%、11.3%和 43.8%;阳性预测值分别为 31.8%、35%和 47.1%;阴性预测值分别为 61.1%、83.3%和 77.8%。漏诊恶性的比例分别为 11.3%、1.5%和 7.7%,过度手术的比例分别为 48.4%、59.1%和 34.6%。

结论

在这项回顾性分析中,欧洲 EBG 以较高的“不必要”切除率为代价,漏诊恶性的比例最低。福冈 ICG 漏诊恶性的比例最高。AGA IG 以较高的漏诊恶性率为代价,不必要手术的比例最低。需要开发更好的生物标志物来预测恶性风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the accuracy of three international guidelines in identifying the risk of malignancy in pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of a surgical treated population.评估三种国际指南在识别胰腺囊肿恶性肿瘤风险中的准确性:一项外科治疗人群的回顾性分析。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2021 Jul-Sep;84(3):443-450. doi: 10.51821/84.3.006.
2
Comparing 3 guidelines on the management of surgically removed pancreatic cysts with regard to pathological outcome.比较3种关于手术切除胰腺囊肿管理的指南在病理结果方面的差异。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May;85(5):1025-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
3
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of three current guidelines for the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cystic neoplasms.三种当前用于评估无症状胰腺囊性肿瘤的指南的诊断准确性比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(35):e7900. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007900.
4
Fukuoka and AGA Criteria Have Superior Diagnostic Accuracy for Advanced Cystic Neoplasms than Sendai Criteria.福冈标准和美国胃肠病学会(AGA)标准对晚期囊性肿瘤的诊断准确性优于仙台标准。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):626-632. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4460-y. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
Guidelines on management of pancreatic cysts detected in high-risk individuals: An evaluation of the 2017 Fukuoka guidelines and the 2020 International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) consortium statements.高危人群胰腺囊肿管理指南:对 2017 年福冈指南和 2020 年国际胰腺癌筛查 (CAPS) 联盟声明的评估。
Pancreatology. 2021 Apr;21(3):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
American Gastroenterological Association guidelines are inaccurate in detecting pancreatic cysts with advanced neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 225 patients with supporting molecular data.美国胃肠病学会指南在检测具有高级别肿瘤性的胰腺囊肿方面存在不准确性:一项包含支持分子数据的 225 例患者的临床病理研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1107-1117.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
Comparing American Gastroenterological Association Pancreatic Cyst Management Guidelines with Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines as Predictors of Advanced Neoplasia in Patients with Suspected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.比较美国胃肠病学会胰腺囊肿管理指南与福冈共识指南对疑似胰腺囊性肿瘤患者高级别肿瘤的预测价值
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Nov;223(5):729-737.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
Sendai and Fukuoka Consensus Guidelines Identify Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Suspected Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Pancreas.《仙台与福冈共识指南:可疑胰腺黏液性囊性肿瘤患者的高级别肿瘤》
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;13(10):1808-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Evaluation of AGA and Fukuoka Guidelines for EUS and surgical resection of incidental pancreatic cysts.评估美国胃肠病学会(AGA)和福冈指南关于超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检术(EUS)及偶然发现的胰腺囊肿手术切除的相关内容。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Feb;5(2):E116-E122. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118703.
10
Cytologic categorization of pancreatic neoplastic mucinous cysts with an assessment of the risk of malignancy: A retrospective study based on the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines.胰腺肿瘤性黏液性囊肿的细胞学分类及恶性风险评估:一项基于帕潘icolaou细胞病理学协会指南的回顾性研究
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Apr;124(4):285-93. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21657. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-center evaluation of radiomics and deep learning to stratify malignancy risk of IPMNs.多中心评估影像组学和深度学习以分层诊断胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤的恶性风险
Res Sq. 2025 May 30:rs.3.rs-6622868. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6622868/v1.
2
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Uncommon imaging presentation, evolution and comparison of guidelines.胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤:不常见的影像学表现、演变及指南比较
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Oct 22;11:100531. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100531. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Clinical and Molecular Attributes and Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm.
临床和分子特征与胰腺囊性肿瘤评估。
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2023 Jan;1878(1):188851. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188851. Epub 2022 Dec 16.