文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

QLU-C10D 和 EQ-5D-3L 在评估食管癌手术后短期生活质量方面的反应性和一致性。

Responsiveness and convergent validity of QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L in assessing short-term quality of life following esophagectomy.

机构信息

Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Oct 2;19(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01867-w.


DOI:10.1186/s12955-021-01867-w
PMID:34600554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8487554/
Abstract

AIM: This study assessed the responsiveness and convergent validity of two preference-based measures; the newly developed cancer-specific EORTC Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) relative to the generic three-level version of the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) in evaluating short-term health related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes after esophagectomy. METHODS: Participants were enrolled in a multicentre randomised controlled trial to determine the impact of preoperative and postoperative immunonutrition versus standard nutrition in patients with esophageal cancer. HRQoL was assessed seven days before and 42 days after esophagectomy. Standardized Response Mean and Effect Size were calculated to assess responsiveness. Ceiling effects for each dimension were calculated as the proportion of the best level responses for that dimension at follow-up/post-operatively. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's correlation and the level of agreement was explored using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Data from 164 respondents (mean age: 63 years, 81% male) were analysed. HRQoL significantly reduced on both measures with large effect sizes (> 0.80), and a greater mean difference (0.29 compared to 0.16) on QLU-C10D. Both measures had ceiling effects (> 15%) on all dimensions at baseline. Following esophagectomy, ceiling effects were observed with self-care (86%), mobility (67%), anxiety/depression (55%) and pain/discomfort (19%) dimensions on EQ-5D-3L. For QLU-C10D ceiling effects were observed with emotional function (53%), physical function (16%), nausea (35%), sleep (31%), bowel problems (21%) and pain (20%). A strong correlation (r = 0.71) was observed between EQ-5D-3L anxiety and QLU-C10D emotional function dimensions. Good agreement (3.7% observations outside the limits of agreement) was observed between the utility scores. CONCLUSION: The QLU-C10D is comparable to the more widely applied generic EQ-5D-3L, however, QLU-C10D was more sensitive to short-term utility changes following esophagectomy. Cognisant of requirements by policy makers to apply generic utility measures in cost effectiveness studies, the disease-specific QLU-C10D should be used alongside the generic measures like EQ-5D-3L. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12611000178943) on the 15th of February 2011.

摘要

目的:本研究评估了两种偏好测量方法的反应度和收敛效度;新开发的癌症特异性 EORTC 生命质量效用测量核心 10 维度(QLU-C10D)与通用三级版欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-3L)在评估食管癌术后短期健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)结果方面的差异。

方法:参与者被纳入一项多中心随机对照试验,以确定术前和术后免疫营养与标准营养对食管癌患者的影响。HRQoL 在食管癌术前 7 天和术后 42 天进行评估。使用标准化反应均值和效应量评估反应度。计算每个维度的天花板效应,即该维度在随访/术后的最佳水平反应比例。收敛效度采用斯皮尔曼相关系数评估,采用 Bland-Altman 图探索一致性水平。

结果:对 164 名应答者(平均年龄:63 岁,81%为男性)的数据进行了分析。两种测量方法的 HRQoL 均显著降低,且 QLU-C10D 的效应量较大(>0.80),平均差异较大(0.29 比 0.16)。在基线时,两种测量方法在所有维度上均存在大于 15%的天花板效应。食管癌术后,EQ-5D-3L 的自我护理(86%)、移动性(67%)、焦虑/抑郁(55%)和疼痛/不适(19%)维度出现天花板效应。QLU-C10D 的情绪功能(53%)、身体功能(16%)、恶心(35%)、睡眠(31%)、肠问题(21%)和疼痛(20%)维度也出现了天花板效应。EQ-5D-3L 的焦虑和 QLU-C10D 的情绪功能维度之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.71)。效用评分之间的一致性较好(3.7%的观察值超出一致性界限)。

结论:QLU-C10D 与更广泛应用的通用 EQ-5D-3L 相当,但 QLU-C10D 对食管癌术后短期效用变化更为敏感。考虑到决策者在成本效益研究中应用通用效用措施的要求,应将疾病特异性 QLU-C10D 与通用措施(如 EQ-5D-3L)一起使用。

试验注册:该试验于 2011 年 2 月 15 日在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12611000178943)注册。

相似文献

[1]
Responsiveness and convergent validity of QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L in assessing short-term quality of life following esophagectomy.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021-10-2

[2]
The EORTC QLU-C10D was more efficient in detecting clinical known group differences in myelodysplastic syndromes than the EQ-5D-3L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021-9

[3]
Cancer-Specific Health Utilities: Evaluation of Core Measurement Properties of the EORTC QLU-C10D in Lung Cancer Patients-Data from Four Multicentre LUX-Lung Trials, Applying Six Country Tariffs.

Pharmacoecon Open. 2024-7

[4]
A Comparison of Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures Using Data From Nivolumab Trials: EQ-5D-3L, Mapping to the EQ-5D-5L, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions.

Value Health. 2021-11

[5]
Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, QLU-C10D and FACT-8D among survivors of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Eur J Health Econ. 2025-6

[6]
Comparison of EQ-5D-3L with QLU-C10D in Metastatic Melanoma Using Cost-Utility Analysis.

Pharmacoecon Open. 2021-9

[7]
The EORTC QLU-C10D is a valid cancer-specific preference-based measure for cost-utility and health technology assessment in the Netherlands.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-12

[8]
Estimation of Health-Related Utilities for Lu-DOTATATE in GEP-NET Patients Using Utilities Mapped from EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D Utilities.

Pharmacoecon Open. 2021-12

[9]
Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLU-C10D utilities in gastric cancer patients.

Eur J Health Econ. 2023-8

[10]
Comparing the Psychometric Performance of Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments in Children and Adolescents with ADHD, Anxiety and/or Depression.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparing EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 utilities with QLU-C10D utilities in hematologic cancer patients.

Eur J Health Econ. 2025-8-8

[2]
Validation of the cancer-specific utility measure EORTC QLU-C10D using evidence from four lung cancer trials covering six country value sets.

Sci Rep. 2025-4-28

[3]
Validation of the Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Measure EORTC QLU-C10D against the Generic Instruments EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in a Prospectively Collected Sample of Patients with Cancer in Austria and France.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2025-4-27

[4]
Cancer-specific utility: clinical validation of the EORTC QLU-C10D in patients with glioblastoma.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-11-20

[5]
A comparison of measurement properties between EORTC QLU-C10D and FACT-8D in patients with hematological malignances.

Health Econ Rev. 2024-10-1

[6]
The added value of the cognition, dining, gastrointestinal problems, sleep and tiredness bolt-on dimensions to the EQ-5D-5L in patients with coeliac disease.

Eur J Health Econ. 2025-4

[7]
Cancer-Specific Health Utilities: Evaluation of Core Measurement Properties of the EORTC QLU-C10D in Lung Cancer Patients-Data from Four Multicentre LUX-Lung Trials, Applying Six Country Tariffs.

Pharmacoecon Open. 2024-7

[8]
The EORTC QLU-C10D is a valid cancer-specific preference-based measure for cost-utility and health technology assessment in the Netherlands.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-12

[9]
Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale.

Cancer Causes Control. 2024-2

[10]
Responsiveness and construct validity of EPIC-26, AQoL-6D and SF-6D following treatment in prostate cancer.

BMC Cancer. 2023-4-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Global Burden, Risk Factors, and Trends of Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis of Cancer Registries from 48 Countries.

Cancers (Basel). 2021-1-5

[2]
Filling the psycho-social gap in the EQ-5D: the empirical support for four bolt-on dimensions.

Qual Life Res. 2020-7-9

[3]
Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?

Med Decis Making. 2019-7-1

[4]
Comparing the EQ-5D-5L utility index based on value sets of different countries: impact on the interpretation of clinical study results.

BMC Res Notes. 2019-1-14

[5]
Multicentre factorial randomized clinical trial of perioperative immunonutrition versus standard nutrition for patients undergoing surgical resection of oesophageal cancer.

Br J Surg. 2018-7-12

[6]
Condition-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A comparison of the EORTC-8D and the EQ-5D-3L.

Qual Life Res. 2017-5

[7]
QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Qual Life Res. 2016-3

[8]
Health state utility instruments compared: inquiring into nonlinearity across EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI-3 and 15D.

Qual Life Res. 2016-7

[9]
Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: A value-based comparison.

J Surg Oncol. 2015-10

[10]
Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format.

Qual Life Res. 2016-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索