Accuracy of digitally planned, guided apicoectomy with a conventional trephine and a custom-made endodontic trephine: An in vitro comparative study.

PURPOSE

Static guided trephine apicoectomy has been developed as a less invasive and more accurate alternative to conventional freehand apicoectomy with drills. Overpenetration is a frequent issue with this procedure, which deteriorates accuracy and raises safety concerns. A safety improvement to address this problem is presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Guided apicoectomies were performed in porcine mandibles with either a conventional bone trephine or a custom-made endo-trephine with built-in depth control. The deviation of the apical endpoint of the trephine from the digital surgical plan was analyzed. Overpenetration frequency was recorded.

RESULTS

Procedures performed with the custom trephine were significantly more accurate both along the x-axis and globally, but no significant difference was found for the y and z axes. Overpenetration frequency was 70% in the conventional trephine group versus 38% in the stop trephine group.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the lack of physical depth control can interfere with the accuracy (and safety) of these procedures to a significant extent, as visual cues (such as the depth markings on a conventional trephine) are insufficient to prevent overpenetration. Our results show that custom-made trephines with a built-in stop offer an optimal solution for this problem.