Department of Pharmacy, 12253University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, 12280Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2023 Apr;36(2):336-341. doi: 10.1177/08971900211048747. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
Rocuronium is an intermediate-acting non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent frequently used in the emergency department for rapid sequence intubation. The prolonged effects of rocuronium may prevent the ability to conduct a meaningful neurological examination, thereby delaying appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Sugammadex and neostigmine are pharmacologic agents commonly used to reverse rocuronium. The safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine with glycopyrrolate for the reversal of rocuronium in the emergency department has not been well described. Evaluate the occurrence of hemodynamic instability post-administration of sugammadex versus neostigmine with glycopyrrolate in the emergency department for the reversal of rocuronium. A retrospective cohort study conducted among adult patients that received sugammadex or neostigmine with glycopyrrolate in the emergency department for the reversal of rocuronium. The primary outcome was occurrence of hemodynamic instability that required escalation of treatment. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of hypotensive, bradycardic, or cardiac arrest events. A total of 37 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 10, sugammadex; n = 27, neostigmine). There was no difference between the two groups in regard to hemodynamic instability that required escalation of treatment within 30 minutes after receiving either sugammadex or neostigmine with glycopyrrolate ( = .557). There was no difference between the two groups in regard to occurrence of hemodynamic instability that required escalation of treatment. Given the small sample size, future studies are warranted to further delineate the safety of sugammadex and neostigmine with glycopyrrolate for the reversal of rocuronium in the emergency department.
罗库溴铵是一种中效非去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂,常用于急诊科行快速序贯插管。罗库溴铵的作用时间延长可能会妨碍进行有意义的神经系统检查,从而延迟适当的诊断和治疗。顺式阿曲库铵和新斯的明是常用于逆转罗库溴铵作用的药物。在急诊科使用顺式阿曲库铵与格隆溴铵和新斯的明逆转罗库溴铵的安全性尚未得到很好的描述。 评估在急诊科使用顺式阿曲库铵与格隆溴铵和新斯的明逆转罗库溴铵后发生的血流动力学不稳定情况。 一项回顾性队列研究在急诊科接受顺式阿曲库铵或新斯的明与格隆溴铵逆转罗库溴铵的成年患者中进行。主要结局是发生需要治疗升级的血流动力学不稳定。次要结局包括发生低血压、心动过缓或心脏骤停事件。 共有 37 名患者符合纳入标准(n = 10,顺式阿曲库铵;n = 27,新斯的明)。在接受顺式阿曲库铵或新斯的明与格隆溴铵逆转罗库溴铵后 30 分钟内,两组在需要治疗升级的血流动力学不稳定方面没有差异( =.557)。两组在需要治疗升级的血流动力学不稳定发生率方面没有差异。鉴于样本量较小,需要进一步的研究来进一步阐明在急诊科使用顺式阿曲库铵和新斯的明与格隆溴铵逆转罗库溴铵的安全性。