From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Department of Biostatistics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.
Anesth Analg. 2024 May 1;138(5):1043-1051. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006807. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
Sugammadex is not advised for patients with severe renal impairment, but has been shown in a variety of other populations to be superior to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The objective of this study was to determine if reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus reversal of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine results in a faster return to a train-of-four ratio (TOFR) ≥90% in patients with severe renal impairment.
We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial at a large county hospital. A total of 49 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included patients age ≥18, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III and IV, with a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, undergoing general anesthesia with expected surgical duration ≥2 hours and necessitating neuromuscular blockade. Subjects received either cisatracurium 0.2 mg/kg or rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg for induction of anesthesia to facilitate tracheal intubation. Subjects were kept at moderate neuromuscular blockade during surgery and received either 2 mg/kg sugammadex or 50 µg/kg neostigmine with 10 µg/kg glycopyrrolate for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed with electromyography (TwitchView), and the TOFR was recorded every minute after administration of the reversal agent. The time from administration of neuromuscular reversal until the patient reached a TOFR ≥90% was recorded as the primary outcome.
The mean time to recovery of TOFR ≥90% was significantly faster with sugammadex at 3.5 (±1.6) min compared with neostigmine at 14.8 (±6.1) min ( P < .0001; mean difference, 11.3 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-13.5 minutes). There were no major adverse events in either group.
In patients with severe renal impairment, neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium followed by reversal with sugammadex provides a significantly faster return of neuromuscular function compared to cisatracurium and neostigmine, without any major adverse effects.
尽管舒更葡糖钠不建议用于严重肾功能不全的患者,但在多种其他人群中,其逆转神经肌肉阻滞的效果优于新斯的明。本研究旨在确定与新斯的明逆转顺式阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞相比,舒更葡糖钠逆转罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞是否能使严重肾功能不全患者更快地恢复到四个成串刺激(TOFR)≥90%。
我们在一家大型县医院进行了一项前瞻性、随机、盲法、对照试验。共纳入 49 名患者。纳入标准包括年龄≥18 岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况 III 级和 IV 级、肌酐清除率<30ml/min、接受全身麻醉且预计手术时间≥2 小时并需要神经肌肉阻滞的患者。受试者接受顺式阿曲库铵 0.2mg/kg 或罗库溴铵 0.6mg/kg 诱导麻醉以方便气管插管。手术期间,受试者保持中度神经肌肉阻滞,并接受 2mg/kg 舒更葡糖钠或 50μg/kg 新斯的明加 10μg/kg 格隆溴铵逆转神经肌肉阻滞。使用肌电图(TwitchView)进行神经肌肉监测,并在给予逆转剂后每分钟记录 TOFR。从给予神经肌肉逆转剂到患者达到 TOFR≥90%的时间记录为主要结局。
舒更葡糖钠组恢复 TOFR≥90%的平均时间明显快于新斯的明组,分别为 3.5(±1.6)分钟和 14.8(±6.1)分钟(P<0.0001;平均差异 11.3 分钟;95%置信区间 [CI] 9.0-13.5 分钟)。两组均无重大不良事件。
在严重肾功能不全患者中,与顺式阿曲库铵和新斯的明相比,罗库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞,随后用舒更葡糖钠逆转可显著更快地恢复神经肌肉功能,且无任何重大不良影响。