Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Armand Trousseau University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS) U1153, INSERM, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology (EPOPé) Research Team, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, APHP, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Oct;40(5):100901. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100901. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
To provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.
A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.
The last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia were published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analysed according to the GRADE® methodology.
The SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations.
There was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia.
为严重子痫前期女性的管理提供国家指南。
成立了一个由 26 名专家组成的共识委员会。在该过程开始时制定了正式的利益冲突(COI)政策,并在整个过程中强制执行。整个指南制定过程独立于任何工业资助。作者被建议遵循推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE®)系统的原则,以指导证据质量的评估。强调了在低质量证据存在的情况下做出强烈推荐的潜在缺点。
SFAR/CNGOF 专家组就严重子痫前期女性的管理发布了最后一份指南,发表于 2009 年。目前的文献足以进行更新。本专家小组指南的目的是分别评估严重子痫前期女性管理的不同方面对母婴发病率的影响。专家们研究了 7 个领域内的问题。每个问题都根据 PICO(患者干预比较结果)模型进行了表述,并生成了证据概况。进行了广泛的文献回顾,并根据 GRADE®方法进行了推荐和分析。
在为改善严重子痫前期女性管理实践提出 25 项建议方面,专家们达成了强烈共识。