Brun J-L, Plu-Bureau G, Huchon C, Ah-Kit X, Barral M, Chauvet P, Cornelis F, Cortet M, Crochet P, Delporte V, Dubernard G, Giraudet G, Gosset A, Graesslin O, Hugon-Rodin J, Lecointre L, Legendre G, Maitrot-Mantelet L, Marcellin L, Miquel L, Le Mitouard M, Proust C, Roquette A, Rousset P, Sangnier E, Sapoval M, Thubert T, Torre A, Trémollières F, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, Vidal F, Marret H
Service de chirurgie gynécologique, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
Unité de gynécologie médicale, hôpital Port-Royal Cochin, AP-HP, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2022 May;50(5):345-373. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.078. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).
A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, or medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.
The last guidelines from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) on the management of women with AUB was published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescent; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; fibroids type 0 to 2; fibroids type 3 and more; adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.
The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 present a strong agreement and 17 a weak agreement. Fourteen questions did not find any response in the literature. We preferred to abstain from recommending instead of providing expert advice.
The 36 recommendations made it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of various clinical situations managed by the practitioner, from the simplest to the most complex.
提供法国关于异常子宫出血(AUB)女性管理的指南。
成立了一个由26名专家组成的共识委员会。在流程开始时制定了正式的利益冲突(COI)政策,并在整个过程中执行。整个指南制定过程独立于任何行业资助(即制药或医疗设备)。建议作者遵循推荐评估、制定和评价分级(GRADE®)系统的规则来指导证据质量评估。强调了在证据质量低的情况下做出强烈推荐的潜在弊端。
法国国家妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)关于AUB女性管理的最新指南于2008年发布。现在的文献似乎足以进行更新。委员会研究了7个领域的问题(诊断;青少年;特发性AUB;子宫内膜增生和息肉;0至2型肌瘤;3型及以上肌瘤;子宫腺肌病)。每个问题都以PICO(患者、干预措施、对照、结局)格式制定,并生成了证据概况。根据GRADE®方法进行文献综述和推荐。
专家的综合工作和GRADE方法的应用产生了36条推荐。在正式的推荐中,19条达成了强烈共识,17条达成了微弱共识。14个问题在文献中未找到任何答案。我们宁愿不做推荐而不是提供专家建议。
这36条推荐使得明确从业者处理的各种临床情况(从最简单到最复杂)的诊断和治疗策略成为可能。