Mao Jing, Sun Hanxiang, Shen Qinxin, Zou Chang, Yang Yuanyuan, Du Qiaoling
Department of Obstetrics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 5;12:1529966. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1529966. eCollection 2025.
It remains unclear how pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) affects preeclampsia in the Chinese population, primarily due to insufficient large-scale research on this topic.
The study aimed to determine the relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI and (severe) preeclampsia in the Chinese population, providing a detailed description of the findings.
The retrospective study included a total of 75,773 pregnant women registered between 2016 and 2020. These participants were categorized into four groups based on their pre-pregnancy BMI: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m), normal weight (BMI 18.5-<24 kg/m), overweight (BMI 24-<28 kg/m), and obese (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m). The relationship between risks of preeclampsia or severe preeclampsia and pre-pregnancy BMI were further explored, with an evaluation of potential modification by maternal age.
A lower risk of developing preeclampsia was observed in the underweight population, with an OR of 0.604 (95%CI, 0.507-0.719). In contrast, women who were overweight or obese during the pre-pregnancy period demonstrated a significantly higher risk of preeclampsia, with ORs of 2.211 (95%CI, 1.967-2.486) and 3.662 (95%CI, 3.026-4.431), respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, the elevated risk of preeclampsia persisted, showing ORs of 2.152(95%CI, 1.911-2.425) for the overweight population and 3.493 (95%CI, 2.874-4.245) for those who were obese, while the risk for underweight women remained lower, with an OR of 0.609(95%CI, 0.511-0.727). For severe preeclampsia, the risk was also higher in the overweight and obese participants after adjusting for confounders, demonstrating ORs of 1.652(95%CI, 1.364-2.001) and 2.762(95%CI, 2.014-3.788), respectively. The underweight population exhibited a lower risk of severe preeclampsia, with an OR of 0.720(95%CI, 0.565-0.919). In addition, these risks were not significantly associated with maternal age.
Regardless of adjustment for confounders, underweight women demonstrated a lower risk of preeclampsia, whereas the overweight/obese population exhibited a higher occurrence of both preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia. These associations were not influenced by maternal age.
孕前体重指数(BMI)如何影响中国人群的子痫前期尚不清楚,主要是因为关于该主题的大规模研究不足。
本研究旨在确定中国人群中孕前BMI与(重度)子痫前期之间的关系,并对研究结果进行详细描述。
这项回顾性研究共纳入了2016年至2020年期间登记的75773名孕妇。这些参与者根据孕前BMI分为四组:体重过轻(BMI<18.5kg/m²)、正常体重(BMI 18.5-<24kg/m²)、超重(BMI 24-<28kg/m²)和肥胖(BMI≥28kg/m²)。进一步探讨子痫前期或重度子痫前期风险与孕前BMI之间的关系,并评估产妇年龄的潜在影响。
体重过轻人群发生子痫前期的风险较低,比值比(OR)为0.604(95%置信区间[CI],0.507-0.719)。相比之下,孕前超重或肥胖的女性发生子痫前期的风险显著更高,OR分别为2.211(95%CI,1.967-2.486)和3.662(95%CI,3.026-4.431)。在调整混杂因素后,子痫前期风险升高仍然存在,超重人群的OR为2.152(95%CI,1.911-2.425),肥胖人群的OR为3.493(95%CI,2.874-4.245),而体重过轻女性的风险仍然较低,OR为0.609(95%CI,0.511-0.727)。对于重度子痫前期,调整混杂因素后,超重和肥胖参与者的风险也更高,OR分别为1.652(95%CI,1.364-2.001)和2.762(95%CI,2.014-3.788)。体重过轻人群发生重度子痫前期的风险较低,OR为0.720(95%CI,0.565-0.919)。此外,这些风险与产妇年龄无显著关联。
无论是否调整混杂因素,体重过轻的女性子痫前期风险较低,而超重/肥胖人群子痫前期和重度子痫前期的发生率较高。这些关联不受产妇年龄的影响。