Wouda Rosa D, Waanders Femke, de Zeeuw Dick, Navis Gerjan, Vogt Liffert
Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Feb 5;14(10):2170-2176. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab031. eCollection 2021 Oct.
BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) lower blood pressure (BP) and proteinuria and reduce renal disease progression in many-but not all-patients. Reduction of dietary sodium intake improves these effects of ARBs. Dietary potassium intake affects BP and proteinuria. We set out to address the effect of potassium intake on BP and proteinuria response to losartan in non-diabetic proteinuric chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. METHODS: We performed a analysis of a placebo-controlled interventional cross-over study in 33 non-diabetic proteinuric patients (baseline mean arterial pressure and proteinuria: 105 mmHg and 3.8 g/day, respectively). Patients were treated for 6 weeks with placebo, losartan and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCT), combined with a habitual (∼200 mmol/day) and low-sodium (LS) diet (<100 mmol/day), in randomized order. To analyse the effects of potassium intake, we categorized patients based on median split of 24-h urinary potassium excretion, reflecting potassium intake. RESULTS: Mean potassium intake was stable during all six treatment periods. Losartan and losartan/HCT lowered BP and proteinuria in all treatment groups. Patients with high potassium intake showed no difference in the BP effects compared with patients with low potassium intake. The antiproteinuric response to losartan monotherapy and losartan combined with HCT during the habitual sodium diet was significantly diminished in patients with high potassium intake (20% versus 41%, P=0.011; and 48% versus 64%, P=0.036). These differences in antiproteinuric response abolished when shifting to the LS diet. CONCLUSIONS: In proteinuric CKD patients, the proteinuria, but not BP-lowering response to losartan during a habitual high-sodium diet was hampered during high potassium intake. Differences disappeared after sodium status change by LS diet.
背景:血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂(ARB)可降低许多(但并非所有)患者的血压(BP)和蛋白尿,并减缓肾脏疾病进展。减少饮食中钠的摄入量可增强ARB的这些作用。饮食中钾的摄入量会影响血压和蛋白尿。我们旨在探讨钾摄入量对非糖尿病蛋白尿慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者血压及氯沙坦治疗蛋白尿反应的影响。 方法:我们对33例非糖尿病蛋白尿患者(基线平均动脉压和蛋白尿分别为105 mmHg和3.8 g/天)进行了一项安慰剂对照干预性交叉研究的分析。患者分别接受为期6周的安慰剂、氯沙坦和氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪(HCT)治疗,随机顺序联合习惯饮食(约200 mmol/天)和低钠(LS)饮食(<100 mmol/天)。为分析钾摄入量的影响,我们根据反映钾摄入量的24小时尿钾排泄中位数将患者分类。 结果:在所有六个治疗期内,平均钾摄入量保持稳定。氯沙坦和氯沙坦/HCT在所有治疗组中均降低了血压和蛋白尿。高钾摄入量患者与低钾摄入量患者相比,血压降低效果无差异。在习惯钠饮食期间,高钾摄入量患者对氯沙坦单药治疗和氯沙坦联合HCT的抗蛋白尿反应显著减弱(20%对41%,P = 0.011;48%对64%,P = 0.036)。转向LS饮食后,这些抗蛋白尿反应的差异消失。 结论:在蛋白尿CKD患者中,高钾摄入时习惯高钠饮食期间氯沙坦的蛋白尿降低反应受到阻碍,但降压反应不受影响。钠状态通过LS饮食改变后差异消失。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-4-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-7-19
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019-2-1
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018-11
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017-3
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016-4
N Engl J Med. 2014-8-14
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014-3-5