Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌调强放疗/容积调强弧形放疗后的复发模式

Recurrence Patterns After IMRT/VMAT in Head and Neck Cancer.

作者信息

Bollen Heleen, van der Veen Julie, Laenen Annouschka, Nuyts Sandra

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 16;11:720052. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.720052. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), two advanced modes of high-precision radiotherapy (RT), have become standard of care in the treatment of head and neck cancer. The development in RT techniques has markedly increased the complexity of target volume definition and accurate treatment delivery. The aim of this study was to indirectly investigate the quality of current TV delineation and RT delivery by analyzing the patterns of treatment failure for head and neck cancer patients in our high-volume RT center.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2014, 385 patients with pharyngeal, laryngeal, and oral cavity tumors were curatively treated with primary RT (IMRT/VMAT). We retrospectively investigated locoregional recurrences (LRR), distant metastases (DM), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6.4 years (IQR 4.7-8.3 years) during which time 122 patients (31.7%) developed LRR (22.1%) and DM (17.7%). The estimated 2- and 5-year locoregional control was 78.2% (95% CI 73.3, 82.3) and 74.2% (95% CI 69.0, 78.8). One patient developed a local recurrence outside the high-dose volume and five patients developed a regional recurrence outside the high-dose volume. Four patients (1.0%) suffered a recurrence in the electively irradiated neck and two patients had a recurrence outside the electively irradiated neck. No marginal failures were observed. The estimated 2- and 5-year DM-free survival rates were 83.3% (95% CI 78.9, 86.9) and 80.0% (95% CI 75.2, 84.0). The estimated 2- and 5-year OS rates were 73.6% (95% CI 68.9, 77.8) and 52. 6% (95% CI 47.3, 57.6). Median OS was 5.5 years (95% CI 4.5, 6.7).

CONCLUSION

Target volume definition and treatment delivery were performed accurately, as only few recurrences occurred outside the high-dose regions and no marginal failures were observed. Research on dose intensification and identification of high-risk subvolumes might decrease the risk of locoregional relapses. The results of this study may serve as reference data for comparison with future studies, such as dose escalation or proton therapy trials.

摘要

目的

调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)是高精度放射治疗(RT)的两种先进模式,已成为头颈癌治疗的标准护理方式。放疗技术的发展显著增加了靶区定义和精确治疗实施的复杂性。本研究的目的是通过分析我们大容量放疗中心头颈癌患者的治疗失败模式,间接调查当前靶区勾画和放疗实施的质量。

方法

2004年至2014年期间,385例咽、喉和口腔肿瘤患者接受了根治性原发放疗(IMRT/VMAT)。我们回顾性调查了局部区域复发(LRR)、远处转移(DM)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

中位随访时间为6.4年(四分位间距4.7 - 8.3年),在此期间122例患者(31.7%)出现LRR(22.1%)和DM(17.7%)。估计的2年和5年局部区域控制率分别为78.2%(95%可信区间73.3, 82.3)和74.2%(95%可信区间69.0, 78.8)。1例患者在高剂量体积外出现局部复发,5例患者在高剂量体积外出现区域复发。4例患者(1.0%)在选择性照射的颈部出现复发,2例患者在选择性照射的颈部外出现复发。未观察到边缘性失败。估计的2年和5年无远处转移生存率分别为83.3%(95%可信区间78.9, 86.9)和80.0%(95%可信区间75.2, 84.0)。估计的2年和5年总生存率分别为73.6%(95%可信区间68.9, 77.8)和52.6%(95%可信区间47.3, 57.6)。中位总生存期为5.5年(95%可信区间4.5, 6.7)。

结论

靶区定义和治疗实施准确,因为只有少数复发发生在高剂量区域外,且未观察到边缘性失败。关于剂量强化和高危亚体积识别的研究可能会降低局部区域复发的风险。本研究结果可作为与未来研究(如剂量递增或质子治疗试验)进行比较的参考数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be9a/8483718/3a2810d8c521/fonc-11-720052-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验