Suppr超能文献

生物胶体的转运机制。

Transport mechanisms of biological colloids.

作者信息

Anderson J L

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;469:166-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb26495.x.

Abstract

An effort was made to distinguish among various mechanisms by which colloidal particles can be transported through liquid solutions. Figures 1-3 provide a visual (Figure: see text) summary of these differences. The various "phoretic" motions (electrophoresis, diffusiophoresis, osmophoresis) differ from sedimentation in that the driving forces operate within a thin interfacial layer at the surface of a particle rather than on the bulk of the article. Because of these surface forces, the velocity field of solvent dragged by a particle undergoing phoretic motion is much weaker (O(r-3)) than in the case of sedimentation (O(r-1)). As a consequence, particle-particle and particle-pore interactions are weak for the phoretic motions; Figures 4 and 5 demonstrate this point. It should be emphasized that the results presented in this paper are strictly valid only for very thin interfacial layers (kappa-1 much less than a, L and K much less than a). The Einstein relation (Eq. 1), which applies to sedimentation and diffusion with Equation 2 used for f, has been incorrect for the phoretic transport. As shown in Table 2, there is no unique value of f that fits all the phenomena, and in fact the magnitude of f for phoretic motion greatly exceeds the Stokes' law coefficient. Unfortunately, Equation 1 is well ingrained in the literature; one objective here was to bring its inadequacies to light. The phoretic transport processes offer important advantages in separations because of the selectivity that may be achieved through surface chemistry. For example, experiments are underway that demonstrate transport of particles across porous membranes by diffusiophoresis. It may prove economically attractive to develop both analytical and preparative separation methods that rely more on the surface properties of biological colloids rather than just their size.

摘要

人们努力区分胶体颗粒在液体溶液中传输的各种机制。图1 - 3直观地(图:见正文)总结了这些差异。各种“泳动”运动(电泳、扩散泳动、渗透泳动)与沉降的不同之处在于,驱动力作用于颗粒表面的薄界面层内,而非颗粒整体。由于这些表面力,经历泳动运动的颗粒所拖动的溶剂速度场比沉降情况(O(r - 1))弱得多(O(r - 3))。因此,对于泳动运动,颗粒 - 颗粒和颗粒 - 孔相互作用较弱;图4和图5说明了这一点。应当强调的是,本文给出的结果仅在非常薄的界面层(κ-1远小于a,L和K远小于a)时才严格有效。适用于沉降和扩散的爱因斯坦关系式(式1),其中f用式2计算,对于泳动传输并不正确。如表2所示,不存在一个能适用于所有现象的唯一f值,实际上泳动运动的f值远超过斯托克斯定律系数。不幸的是,式1在文献中已根深蒂固;这里的一个目的是揭示其不足之处。由于可通过表面化学实现选择性,泳动传输过程在分离中具有重要优势。例如,正在进行的实验表明颗粒通过扩散泳动穿过多孔膜。开发更多依赖生物胶体表面性质而非仅仅其大小的分析和制备分离方法可能在经济上具有吸引力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验