Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec;58(6):909-915. doi: 10.1002/uog.24793.
To describe and compare the characteristics of ectopic pregnancies (EPs) in the year prior to vs during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
This was a retrospective analysis of women diagnosed with an EP on transvaginal sonography conducted at a center in London, UK, providing early-pregnancy assessment, between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. Women were identified via the Astraia ultrasound reporting system using coded and non-coded outcomes of EP or pregnancy outside the uterine cavity. Data related to predefined outcomes were collected using Astraia and Cerner electronic reporting systems. Main outcome measures included clinical, ultrasound and biochemical features of EP, in addition to reported complications and management.
There were 22 683 consultations over the 2-year period. Following consultation, a similar number and proportion of EPs were diagnosed in 2019 (141/12 657 (1%)) and 2020 (134/10 026 (1%)). Both cohorts were comparable in age, ethnicity, weight and method of conception. Gestational age at the first transvaginal sonography scan and at diagnosis were similar, and no difference in location, size or morphology of EP was found between the two cohorts. Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels at the time of EP diagnosis were higher in 2020 than in 2019 (1005 IU/L vs 665 IU/L; P = 0.03). The proportions of women according to type of final EP management were similar, but the rate of failed first-line management was higher during vs before the pandemic (16% vs 6%; P = 0.01). The rates of blood detected in the pelvis (hemoperitoneum) on ultrasound (23% vs 26%; P = 0.58) and of ruptured EP confirmed surgically (9% vs 3%; P = 0.07) were similar in 2019 vs 2020.
No difference was observed in the location, size, morphology or gestational age at the first ultrasound examination or at diagnosis of EP between women diagnosed before vs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Complication rates and final management strategy were also unchanged. However, hCG levels and the failure rate of first-line conservative management measures were higher during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that women continued to access appropriate care for EP during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no evidence of diagnostic delay or an increase in adverse outcome in our population. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
描述并比较 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行前后异位妊娠(EP)的特征。
这是对在英国伦敦一家提供早孕评估的中心进行经阴道超声检查诊断为 EP 的妇女进行的回顾性分析,该中心在 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日之间进行。通过 Astraia 超声报告系统使用 EP 或子宫外妊娠的编码和非编码结果来识别妇女。使用 Astraia 和 Cerner 电子报告系统收集与预定义结果相关的数据。主要观察指标包括 EP 的临床、超声和生化特征,以及报告的并发症和管理。
在 2 年期间共进行了 22683 次咨询。咨询后,2019 年(141/12657(1%))和 2020 年(134/10026(1%))诊断出的 EP 数量和比例相似。两个队列在年龄、种族、体重和受孕方式方面均相似。首次经阴道超声检查和诊断时的孕龄相似,两个队列的 EP 位置、大小或形态无差异。2020 年 EP 诊断时的血清人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)水平高于 2019 年(1005IU/L vs 665IU/L;P=0.03)。根据最终 EP 管理类型的妇女比例相似,但大流行期间一线治疗失败的比例高于大流行前(16% vs 6%;P=0.01)。超声检查中盆腔(血腹)检测到血液的比例(23% vs 26%;P=0.58)和手术证实的 EP 破裂比例(9% vs 3%;P=0.07)在 2019 年与 2020 年相似。
在 EP 的位置、大小、形态或首次超声检查或诊断时的孕龄方面,在 COVID-19 大流行前诊断的妇女与大流行期间诊断的妇女之间没有差异。并发症发生率和最终管理策略也没有变化。然而,大流行期间 hCG 水平和一线保守治疗措施失败率较高。我们的研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,妇女继续获得 EP 的适当治疗,在我们的人群中没有证据表明诊断延迟或不良结局增加。