Adam Ralf, Grender Julie, Timm Hans, Qaqish Jimmy, Goyal C Ram
Research Fellow, Procter and Gamble Service GmbH, Kronberg, Germany.
Research Fellow Statistician, The Procter and Gamble Company, Mason, Ohio.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2021 Oct;42(9):e1-e4.
The objective of this study was to compare the antigingivitis and antiplaque efficacy of an oral hygiene system versus a control regimen. This was a single-center, randomized, examiner-blind, two-treatment, 12-week parallel group study in adults with evidence of gingivitis and plaque. Eligible subjects were stratified by baseline gingivitis and plaque scores, number of bleeding sites, and tobacco use and randomized to one of two treatment groups: (1) oral hygiene system (test group) involving a novel smart-connected Oral-B® iO oscillating-rotating (O-R) electric toothbrush, 0.454 percent stabilized stannous fluoride (SnF2) dentifrice, 0.07 percent cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) rinse, and floss, or (2) control regimen involving a manual toothbrush and 0.243 percent sodium fluoride dentifrice. Gingivitis (modified gingival index, gingival bleeding index) and plaque (Rustogi modification of the navy plaque index) were assessed at Baseline, Week 1, and Week 12.
本研究的目的是比较一种口腔卫生系统与一种对照方案的抗牙龈炎和抗牙菌斑功效。这是一项单中心、随机、检查者盲法、双治疗、为期12周的平行组研究,研究对象为有牙龈炎和牙菌斑证据的成年人。符合条件的受试者根据基线牙龈炎和牙菌斑评分、出血部位数量以及烟草使用情况进行分层,然后随机分为两个治疗组之一:(1)口腔卫生系统(试验组),包括一款新型智能连接的欧乐B® iO旋转振荡电动牙刷、0.454%稳定氟化亚锡(SnF2)牙膏、0.07%西吡氯铵(CPC)漱口水和牙线;或(2)对照方案,包括一支手动牙刷和0.243%氟化钠牙膏。在基线、第1周和第12周评估牙龈炎(改良牙龈指数、牙龈出血指数)和牙菌斑(海军牙菌斑指数的鲁斯托吉改良版)。