Graves Andrew, Grahl Troy, Keiserman Mark, Kingsley Karl
Department of Advanced Education in Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, 1700 W. Charleston Boulevard, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.
Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, 1700 W. Charleston Boulevard, Las Vegas, NV 89106, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;11(2):46. doi: 10.3390/dj11020046.
Although many randomized controlled trials (RCT) have evaluated the efficacy of powered or electric toothbrushes compared with manual or traditional toothbrushes to remove biofilm and plaque, only one systematic review has been published for pediatric patients. The primary objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta analysis for this population. Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol, N = 321 studies were initially identified. Three independent, blinded abstract reviews were completed resulting in a total of n = 38/322 or 11.8% for the final analysis (n = 27 non-orthodontic, n = 11 orthodontic studies). Meta analysis of these outcome data have revealed a strong reduction in plaque index scores among pediatric patients using electric toothbrushes of approximately 17.2% for non-orthodontic patients and 13.9% for orthodontic patients. These results provide strong clinical evidence for recommending electric toothbrushing to pediatric patients, as well as those patients undergoing orthodontic therapy and treatment.
尽管许多随机对照试验(RCT)评估了电动牙刷与手动或传统牙刷相比在清除生物膜和牙菌斑方面的功效,但针对儿科患者仅发表了一项系统评价。本研究的主要目的是对该人群进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)方案,最初识别出N = 321项研究。完成了三项独立的、盲法摘要评审,最终分析共纳入n = 38/322项研究,即11.8%(n = 27项非正畸研究,n = 11项正畸研究)。对这些结果数据的荟萃分析显示,使用电动牙刷的儿科患者的菌斑指数得分大幅降低,非正畸患者约降低17.2%,正畸患者约降低13.9%。这些结果为向儿科患者以及接受正畸治疗的患者推荐电动牙刷提供了有力的临床证据。