Komazec Stephanie, Farmer Clare
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Violence Gend. 2024 Mar 1;11(1):14-21. doi: 10.1089/vio.2023.0011. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) removes or reduces reproductive autonomy and decision-making. RCA-focused research is mostly situated within a health care perspective, with much less focus on sociolegal or criminological considerations. This article reports a summary of findings from an examination of existing Australian family violence legislation to discern whether these provisions could facilitate improved responses to RCA. The study analyzed whether and how RCA is reflected within legislative definitions of family violence across Australia, to determine their potential protective scope. The state of South Australia is the only jurisdiction to provide explicit reference to behaviors regarded as RCA, but many definitions within the family violence legislation in other jurisdictions implicitly cover RCA. While such implicit coverage may hinder the recognition of RCA as a form of family violence, it may also provide sufficient flexibility to enable RCA to be addressed through the legal application of current family violence policy and legislation-with consequential potential benefits for the identification and support of victim-survivors.
生殖胁迫与虐待(RCA)剥夺或削弱了生殖自主权和决策权。以RCA为重点的研究大多从医疗保健角度出发,较少关注社会法律或犯罪学方面的考量。本文报告了一项对澳大利亚现行家庭暴力立法进行审查的研究结果总结,以确定这些条款是否有助于改善对RCA的应对。该研究分析了RCA在澳大利亚各地家庭暴力立法定义中的体现方式及是否有所体现,以确定其潜在的保护范围。南澳大利亚州是唯一明确提及被视为RCA行为的司法管辖区,但其他司法管辖区家庭暴力立法中的许多定义也隐含地涵盖了RCA。虽然这种隐含的涵盖可能会阻碍将RCA识别为一种家庭暴力形式,但它也可能提供足够的灵活性,使RCA能够通过现行家庭暴力政策和立法的法律应用来得到解决,从而为识别和支持受害者幸存者带来潜在益处。