Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0258228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258228. eCollection 2021.
People differ in how much personal importance, and moral relevance, they ascribe to epistemic rationality. These stable individual differences can be assessed using the Importance of Rationality Scale (IRS), and Moralized Rationality Scale (MRS). Furthermore, these individual differences are conceptually distinct, and associated with different cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. However, little is known about what signifies and differentiates people who score high (vs. low) on the IRS and MRS respectively, and where these individual differences stem from. In the present research we begin to address these questions by examining how these epistemic values relate to the Big Five personality traits. Two studies consistently show that both the IRS and MRS are positively related to Openness to experience. However, only the MRS is negatively associated with Agreeableness, and only the IRS is positively associated with Conscientiousness.
人们对认知理性赋予了多少个人重要性和道德相关性存在差异。这些稳定的个体差异可以通过重要性推理量表(IRS)和道德推理量表(MRS)来评估。此外,这些个体差异在概念上是不同的,与不同的认知、情感和行为结果相关。然而,对于分别在 IRS 和 MRS 上得分高(vs. 低)的人有什么标志和区别,以及这些个体差异源自何处,人们知之甚少。在本研究中,我们开始通过研究这些认知价值观与大五人格特质的关系来解决这些问题。两项研究一致表明,IRS 和 MRS 都与开放性经验呈正相关。然而,只有 MRS 与宜人性呈负相关,只有 IRS 与尽责性呈正相关。