Herrmann Janne Rothmar, Petersen Annika Frida
Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen Karen Blixens Plads 16,DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark.
Eur J Health Law. 2021 Sep 29:1-16. doi: 10.1163/15718093-bja10054.
In 2016, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted General Comment 22 on the right to sexual and reproductive health, which affirmed that states are obliged to adopt "appropriate legislative measures" to achieve the full realization of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It affirmed that the right to sexual and reproductive health is an integral part of the right to health and recognizes abortion services as a component part of the right to health. While a liberal legislation is in itself a step towards the realization of this obligation, in this article we explore a number of potential barriers to abortion access in an autonomy-based legal model using the Danish legal model as the case study.
2016年，经济、社会及文化权利委员会通过了关于性健康和生殖健康权利的第22号一般性意见，其中申明各国必须采取“适当的立法措施”以充分实现性健康和生殖健康及权利。该意见申明，性健康和生殖健康权利是健康权的一个组成部分，并承认堕胎服务是健康权的一部分。虽然宽松的立法本身是朝着履行这一义务迈出的一步，但在本文中，我们以丹麦法律模式为案例研究，探讨了基于自主权的法律模式中在堕胎服务获取方面存在的一些潜在障碍。
