Suppr超能文献

解决体重歧视和欺凌问题的政策:来自六个国家参与体重管理的成年人的观点。

Policies to address weight discrimination and bullying: Perspectives of adults engaged in weight management from six nations.

机构信息

Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.

Department of Human Development & Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 Nov;29(11):1787-1798. doi: 10.1002/oby.23275. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Across the world, it remains legal to discriminate against people because of their weight. Although US studies demonstrate public support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination, multinational research is scarce. The present study conducted a multinational comparison of support for legislative measures to address weight discrimination and bullying across six countries.

METHODS

Participants were adults (n = 13,996) enrolled in an international weight-management program and residing in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the UK, and the US. Participants completed identical online surveys that assessed support for antidiscrimination laws and policies to address weight bullying, demographic characteristics, and personal experiences of weight stigma.

RESULTS

Across countries, support was high for laws (90%) and policies (92%) to address weight-based bullying, whereas greater between-country variation emerged in support for legislation to address weight-based discrimination in employment (61%, 79%), as a human rights issue (57%), and through existing disability protections (47%). Findings highlight few and inconsistent links between policy support and sociodemographic correlates or experienced or internalized weight stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

Support for policies to address weight stigma is present among people engaged in weight management across Westernized countries; findings offer an informative comparison point for future cross-country research and can inform policy discourse to address weight discrimination and bullying.

摘要

目的

在全球范围内,基于体重对人们进行歧视仍然是合法的。尽管美国的研究表明公众支持立法禁止体重歧视,但跨国研究却很少。本研究对六个国家/地区的立法措施以解决体重歧视和欺凌问题进行了跨国比较。

方法

参与者为参加国际体重管理计划并居住在澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、德国、英国和美国的成年人(n = 13,996)。参与者完成了相同的在线调查,评估了针对体重欺凌的反歧视法律和政策的支持情况、人口统计学特征以及体重耻辱感的个人经历。

结果

在所有国家/地区,针对基于体重的欺凌行为制定法律(90%)和政策(92%)的支持率都很高,而在支持立法以解决就业中基于体重的歧视(61%,79%)、作为人权问题(57%)以及通过现有残疾保护(47%)方面,各国之间的差异较大。研究结果表明,政策支持与社会人口统计学相关因素或经历或内化的体重耻辱感之间的联系很少且不一致。

结论

在参与西方国家体重管理的人群中,针对体重耻辱感的政策得到了支持;研究结果为未来的跨国研究提供了有价值的比较点,并为解决体重歧视和欺凌问题提供了政策讨论的信息。

相似文献

4
International comparisons of weight stigma: addressing a void in the field.国际体重歧视比较:填补该领域空白。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Sep;45(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00860-z. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6

本文引用的文献

1
International comparisons of weight stigma: addressing a void in the field.国际体重歧视比较:填补该领域空白。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Sep;45(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00860-z. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
Public beliefs about causes of obesity in the USA and in Germany.公众对美国和德国肥胖原因的看法。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Nov;64(8):1139-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01295-0. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
8
Redefine statistical significance.重新定义统计学显著性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验