Medical Director H144, Health Service of the Principality of Asturias, Oviedo (Spain).
Emergency and Disaster Research Unit, University of Oviedo, Oviedo (Spain).
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Dec;36(6):774-781. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001102. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) temporary hospitals, also called "alternate care sites" (ACS), as support to the health network have had uneven use. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published different recommendations in this regard. World-wide, many health services have improved their surge capacity with the implementation of new temporary hospital structures, but there have been few experiences of use over time despite representing an important element as support to the hospital network in the management of COVID-19 patients. In this article, the experiences are explained in the design, execution, and use of the temporary COVID-19 Hospital H144 of the Health Service of the Principality of Asturias (Sespa), with 144 beds, which was in operation from April 1 through July 1, 2020 (without admitting patients) and from November 12, 2020 through March 5, 2121, admitting a total of 334 COVID-19 patients (66% women; 34% men) and generating 3,149 hospital stays. Maximum occupancy was 74 patients. Mean stay was 9.42 days (MD = 3.99; [1-34]). At discharge, 126 patients (38%) went to a nursing home, 112 (33%) to their home, 40 (12%) were transferred to another hospital, and 56 (17%) died. The mean age of the admitted patients was 82.79 years (MD = 8.68; [29-104]) and was higher in women (85.09; MD = 7.57; P = .000) than in men (78.28; MD = 9.22). Some aspects to consider for future experiences of use have been: teamwork from different fields of knowledge (ie, architecture, engineering, medicine, and nursing) is essential for success; integration in the health system must be fully developed from different perspectives (ie, information system, logistics, medical records, or clinical procedures, among others); clear procedures for patient admission from different structures (ie, home, hospitals, nursing homes, or primary health care network) must combine with flexibility of use to adapt to new and unknown circumstances; and they must not compromise specialized staff availability in other health facilities.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)临时医院,也称为“替代护理场所”(ACS),作为对卫生网络的支持,其使用情况参差不齐。世界卫生组织(WHO)就此发布了不同的建议。在全球范围内,许多卫生服务机构通过实施新的临时医院结构提高了其应变能力,但随着时间的推移,尽管作为 COVID-19 患者管理的医院网络的重要支持元素,其使用经验却很少。本文介绍了阿斯图里亚斯卫生服务部(Sespa)临时 COVID-19 医院 H144 的设计、执行和使用经验,该医院有 144 张床位,于 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 7 月 1 日(未收治患者)和 2020 年 11 月 12 日至 2121 年 3 月 5 日投入运营,共收治 334 名 COVID-19 患者(66%为女性;34%为男性),产生 3149 次住院。最大入住率为 74 名患者。平均住院时间为 9.42 天(MD = 3.99;[1-34])。出院时,126 名患者(38%)去了疗养院,112 名(33%)回家,40 名(12%)转院,56 名(17%)死亡。入院患者的平均年龄为 82.79 岁(MD = 8.68;[29-104]),女性(85.09;MD = 7.57;P =.000)高于男性(78.28;MD = 9.22)。未来使用经验需要考虑的一些方面是:来自不同知识领域(即建筑、工程、医学和护理)的团队合作对于成功至关重要;必须从不同角度(即信息系统、物流、病历或临床程序等)充分整合到卫生系统中;不同结构(即家庭、医院、疗养院或初级保健网络)的患者入院程序必须结合使用的灵活性,以适应新的和未知的情况;并且它们绝不能危及其他卫生设施中专业人员的可用性。