Suppr超能文献

支持还是限制?新冠疫情战争隐喻对中国大陆残疾人的影响。

Supportive or Confining? The Impact of War Metaphors From the COVID-19 Pandemic on Persons With Disabilities in Mainland China.

机构信息

Department of Social Security, School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Department of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 20;9:720512. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.720512. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Ensuring the well-being of persons with disabilities (PWDs) is a priority in the public sector during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To contain this unprecedented public crisis in China, a set of nationwide anti-epidemic discourse systems centered on war metaphors has guided the epidemic's prevention and control. While the public is immersed in the joy brought by the stage victory, most ignore the situation of the disadvantaged PWDs. Accordingly, this study adopts and presents a qualitative research method to explore the impact of war metaphors on PWDs. The results showed that while there was some formal and informal support for PWDs during this period, they were increasingly marginalized. Owing to the lack of a disability lens and institutional exclusion, PWDs were placed on the margins of the epidemic prevention and control system like outsiders. Affected by pragmatism under war metaphors, PWDs are regarded as non-contributory or inefficient persons; therefore, they are not prioritized and are thus placed into a state of being voiceless and invisible. This research can provide inspiration for improving public services for PWDs in the context of COVID-19.

摘要

保障残疾人士(PWDs)的福祉是 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间公共部门的首要任务。为了遏制中国这一前所未有的公共危机,一套以战争隐喻为中心的全国性防疫话语体系指导了疫情的防控。当公众沉浸在阶段性胜利带来的喜悦中时,大多数人忽视了处境不利的残疾人士的情况。因此,本研究采用并呈现了一种定性研究方法,以探讨战争隐喻对残疾人士的影响。研究结果表明,虽然在此期间残疾人士得到了一些正式和非正式的支持,但他们却日益被边缘化。由于缺乏残疾视角和制度排斥,残疾人士在防疫体系中被视为局外人而处于边缘地位。在战争隐喻下的实用主义影响下,残疾人士被视为无贡献或效率低下的人;因此,他们不受重视,处于无声无息的状态。本研究可以为改善 COVID-19 背景下残疾人士的公共服务提供启示。

相似文献

5
Must there be a "war" against coronavirus?是否必须开展一场针对冠状病毒的“战争”?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul-Sep;V(3):222-226. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.070.
7
"Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters" - Metaphors and Covid-19.“非战士,乃消防员”——隐喻与新冠疫情。
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):50-58. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Disability, communication, and life itself in the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行中残疾、沟通和生命本身
Health Sociol Rev. 2020 Jul;29(2):168-176. doi: 10.1080/14461242.2020.1784020. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Disability, Ethics, and Health Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic.《COVID-19 大流行中的残疾、伦理与医疗保健》
Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(10):1523-1527. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305837. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Reflexivity: promoting rigour in qualitative research.反思性:提升质性研究的严谨性
Nurs Stand. 2009;23(23):42-6. doi: 10.7748/ns2009.02.23.23.42.c6800.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验