Franceschilli Marzia, Di Carlo Sara, Vinci Danilo, Sensi Bruno, Siragusa Leandro, Bellato Vittoria, Caronna Roberto, Rossi Piero, Cavallaro Giuseppe, Guida Andrea, Sibio Simone
Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Unit, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome 00133, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Unit of Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00161, Italy.
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Sep 6;9(25):7297-7305. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i25.7297.
Since the 19 century, appropriate lymphadenectomy has been considered a cornerstone of oncologic surgery and one of the most important prognostic factors. This approach can be applied to any surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. During surgery for colon and rectal cancer, an adequate portion of the mesentery is removed together with the segment of bowel affected by the disease. The adequate number of lymph nodes to be removed is standardized and reported by several guidelines. It is mandatory to determine the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy and to balance its oncological benefits with the increased morbidity associated with its execution in cancer patients. Our review focuses on the concept of "complete mesenteric excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL)," a radical lymphadenectomy for colorectal cancer that has gained increasing interest in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of this approach over the years, its potential oncologic benefits and potential risks, and the improvements offered by laparoscopic techniques. Theoretical advantages of CME are improved local-relapse rates due to complete removal of the intact mesocolic fascia and improved distance recurrence rates due to ligation of vessels at their origin (CVL) which guarantees removal of a larger number of lymph nodes. The development and worldwide diffusion of laparoscopic techniques minimized postoperative trauma in oncologic surgery, providing the same oncologic results as open surgery. This has been widely applied to colorectal cancer surgery; however, CME entails a technical complexity that can limit its wide minimally-invasive application. This review analyzes results of these procedures in terms of oncological outcomes, technical feasibility and complexity, especially within the context of minimally invasive surgery.
自19世纪以来,恰当的淋巴结清扫术一直被视为肿瘤外科手术的基石以及最重要的预后因素之一。这种方法可应用于任何胃肠道癌手术。在结肠癌和直肠癌手术中,会将足够的肠系膜部分与受疾病影响的肠段一并切除。需要切除的淋巴结数量有标准规定,并由多项指南进行报告。确定恰当的淋巴结清扫范围并在癌症患者中权衡其肿瘤学益处与因实施该手术而增加的发病率至关重要。我们的综述聚焦于“完整系膜切除(CME)联合中央血管结扎(CVL)”这一概念,它是一种近年来越来越受关注的结直肠癌根治性淋巴结清扫术。本研究的目的是评估该方法多年来的演变、其潜在的肿瘤学益处和潜在风险,以及腹腔镜技术所带来的改进。CME的理论优势在于,由于完整切除了完整的结肠系膜筋膜,局部复发率得以改善;由于在血管起源处进行结扎(CVL),保证了切除更多数量的淋巴结,远处复发率也得以改善。腹腔镜技术的发展和在全球的普及使肿瘤外科手术的术后创伤最小化,提供了与开放手术相同的肿瘤学效果。这已广泛应用于结直肠癌手术;然而,CME存在技术复杂性,可能会限制其广泛的微创应用。本综述从肿瘤学结局、技术可行性和复杂性方面分析了这些手术的结果,尤其是在微创手术的背景下。