Lange Matthias, Hirahara Annie M, Ranjan Ravi, Stoddard Gregory J, Dosdall Derek J
Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovasular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0258285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258285. eCollection 2021.
Slow conduction areas and conduction block in the atria are considered pro-arrhythmic conditions. Studies examining the size and distribution of slow conduction regions in the context of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may help to develop improved therapeutic strategies for patients with AF. In this work, we studied the differences of size and number in slow conduction areas between control and persistent AF goats and the influence of propagation direction on the development of these pathological conduction areas. Epicardial atrial electrical activations from the left atrial roof were optically mapped with physiological pacing cycle lengths and for the shortest captured cycle lengths. The recordings were converted to local activation times and conduction velocity measures. Regions with slow conduction velocity (less than [Formula: see text]) were identified. The size of the connected regions and the number of non-connected regions were counted for propagation from different orthogonal directions. We found that regions of slow conduction significantly increases in our 15 persistent AF goat recordings in response to premature stimulation (24.4±4.3% increase to 36.6±4.4%, p < 0.001). This increase is driven by an increase of size from (3.70±0.89[mm2] to 6.36±0.91[mm2], p = 0.014) for already existing regions and not by generation of new slow conduction regions (11.6±1.8 vs. 13±1.9, p = 0.242). In 12 control goat recordings, no increase from baseline pacing to premature pacing was found. Similarly, size of the slow conduction areas and the count did not change significantly in control animals.
心房中的缓慢传导区域和传导阻滞被认为是促心律失常的情况。在持续性心房颤动(AF)背景下研究缓慢传导区域的大小和分布的研究,可能有助于为AF患者制定更好的治疗策略。在这项工作中,我们研究了对照山羊和持续性AF山羊之间缓慢传导区域的大小和数量差异,以及传播方向对这些病理性传导区域发展的影响。使用生理起搏周期长度和最短捕获周期长度,对来自左心房顶部的心房外膜电激活进行光学标测。将记录转换为局部激活时间和传导速度测量值。识别出传导速度缓慢(小于[公式:见正文])的区域。计算从不同正交方向传播的连通区域的大小和非连通区域的数量。我们发现,在我们的15只持续性AF山羊记录中,响应过早刺激,缓慢传导区域显著增加(从24.4±4.3%增加到36.6±4.4%,p<0.001)。这种增加是由现有区域的大小增加(从3.70±0.89[mm2]增加到6.36±0.91[mm2],p = 0.014)驱动的,而不是由新的缓慢传导区域的产生(11.6±1.8对13±1.9,p = 0.242)驱动的。在12只对照山羊记录中,未发现从基线起搏到过早起搏有增加。同样,对照动物中缓慢传导区域的大小和计数没有显著变化。