Suppr超能文献

PD-1 抑制剂联合 GVD(吉西他滨、长春瑞滨、脂质体多柔比星)与 GVD 方案作为复发/难治性经典霍奇金淋巴瘤二线治疗的比较。

Combination of PD-1 inhibitor with GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, liposomal doxorubicin) versus GVD regimen as second-line therapy for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P.R. China.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2022 Jan;196(1):127-135. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17849. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

Abstract

Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who do not achieve complete remission (CR) after second-line chemotherapy have poor clinical outcomes. Besides, conventional salvage chemotherapy regimens have an unsatisfactory CR rate. The present retrospective study reports the efficacy and toxicity of the GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, liposomal doxorubicin) regimen with or without programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with cHL who failed first-line treatment. A total of 103 patients with cHL (GVD+PD-1 group, n = 27; GVD group, n = 76) with response assessment based on positron emission tomography were included. The GVD+PD-1 group tended to have a higher CR rate than GVD group (85·2% vs. 65·8%, P = 0·057) and had a better event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0·034). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with low-risk second-line International Prognostic Score might benefit from the addition of PD-1 inhibitor (GVD+PD-1 vs. GVD, 100·0% vs. 64·7%, P = 0·028) and had better EFS than GVD alone (P = 0·016). Further analysis demonstrated that PD-1 consolidation therapy might provide an EFS benefit (P = 0·007). The toxicity of the GVD+PD-1 regimen was comparable to the GVD regimen, except for higher rates of hypothyroidism and autoimmune pneumonitis, which were manageable. In conclusion, combining a PD-1 inhibitor with a GVD regimen could be a potentially effective second-line therapy for patients with cHL.

摘要

对于未在二线化疗后达到完全缓解(CR)的经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)患者,其临床结局较差。此外,常规挽救性化疗方案的 CR 率并不理想。本回顾性研究报告了 GVD(吉西他滨、长春瑞滨、脂质体多柔比星)方案联合或不联合程序性死亡受体 1(PD-1)抑制剂治疗一线治疗失败的 cHL 患者的疗效和毒性。共纳入 103 例基于正电子发射断层扫描评估反应的 cHL 患者(GVD+PD-1 组,n=27;GVD 组,n=76)。GVD+PD-1 组的 CR 率高于 GVD 组(85.2% vs. 65.8%,P=0.057),无事件生存(EFS)更好(P=0.034)。亚组分析显示,二线国际预后评分低危的患者可能受益于 PD-1 抑制剂的加入(GVD+PD-1 组 vs. GVD 组,100.0% vs. 64.7%,P=0.028),且 EFS 优于 GVD 单药(P=0.016)。进一步分析表明,PD-1 巩固治疗可能带来 EFS 获益(P=0.007)。GVD+PD-1 方案的毒性与 GVD 方案相当,但甲状腺功能减退和自身免疫性肺炎的发生率较高,这是可管理的。总之,PD-1 抑制剂联合 GVD 方案可能是 cHL 患者潜在有效的二线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验