Schmidt A, Bundgaard A
Eur J Respir Dis Suppl. 1986;143:57-61.
Five adult asthmatics completed five standardized exercise tests while inhaling aerosols with different osmolarities. The nebulized solutions were 2% NaCl (osmolarity = 616 mosm), 4% NaCl (osmolarity = 1232 mosm), 6.1% dextrose (osmolarity = 308 mosm = isoosmolar), 24.4% dextrose (osmolarity = 1232 mosm) and distilled water (osmolarity = 0). All the patients had EIA. During the study all conditions, except the osmolarity of the inhaled aerosols were kept constant. There was no statistical difference in the response to the exercise on the five days, the fall in PEF being 22.8% after exercise while inhaling 2% NaCl, 17.8% after inhaling 4% NaCl, 16.2 after inhaling 6.1% dextrose, 24.8% after inhaling 24.4% dextrose and 21.6% after exercise while inhaling nebulized distilled water, respectively. It is concluded that the osmolarity of the inhaled aerosol is of little or no importance in exercise-induced asthma.
五名成年哮喘患者在吸入不同渗透压的气雾剂时完成了五项标准化运动测试。雾化溶液分别为2%氯化钠(渗透压=616毫渗量)、4%氯化钠(渗透压=1232毫渗量)、6.1%葡萄糖(渗透压=308毫渗量=等渗)、24.4%葡萄糖(渗透压=1232毫渗量)和蒸馏水(渗透压=0)。所有患者均患有运动诱发性哮喘(EIA)。在研究过程中,除了吸入气雾剂的渗透压外,所有条件均保持恒定。五天的运动反应无统计学差异,吸入2%氯化钠时运动后呼气峰流速(PEF)下降22.8%,吸入4%氯化钠后为17.8%,吸入6.1%葡萄糖后为16.2%,吸入24.4%葡萄糖后为24.8%,吸入雾化蒸馏水时运动后为21.6%。研究得出结论,吸入气雾剂的渗透压在运动诱发性哮喘中几乎没有或没有重要影响。