• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在控制混杂因素后, homeless 和 non-homeless ED 患者的 COVID-19 发病率相同。

Equal incidence of COVID-19 among homeless and non-homeless ED patients when controlling for confounders.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Louisville (UofL), United States of America.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Louisville (UofL), United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:286.e5-286.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.057. Epub 2021 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.057
PMID:34620530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8463297/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) a pandemic in March 2020. Theoretically, homeless patients could have disproportionately worse outcomes from COVID-19, but little research has corroborated this claim. This study aimed to examine the demographics and incidence of COVID-19 in homeless vs non-homeless emergency department (ED) patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients seen in the University of Louisville Hospital Emergency Department (ULH ED) from March 2019 to December 2020, excluding January and February 2020. Data was collected from the Kentucky Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and ULH electronic health records.

RESULTS

A total of 51,532 unique patients had 87,869 visits during the study period. There was a 18.1% decrease in homeless patient visits over the time period, which was similar to the decrease in non-homeless patient visits (19.2%). In the total population, 9471 individuals had known COVID-19 testing results, with a total of 610 positive (6.4% positivity rate). Of the 712 homeless ED patients, 39 tested positive (5.5% positivity rate). After adjusting for age, gender identity, race, and insurance, there was no statistically significant difference in test positivity between homeless and non-homeless patients, OR 1.23 (0.88, 1.73). Homeless patients were less likely to be admitted to either the intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: OR 0.51, 0.60) as they were more likely to be discharged (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.52, 1.79).

CONCLUSION

Previous literature has indicated that higher disease burden, lack of access to social distancing, and poor hygiene would increase the risk of homeless individuals contracting COVID-19 and experiencing serious morbidity. However, this study found that homelessness was not an independent risk factor for COVID-19 infection.

摘要

简介

世界卫生组织(WHO)于 2020 年 3 月宣布严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)为大流行。理论上,无家可归者可能会因 COVID-19 而遭受不成比例的更严重后果,但很少有研究证实这一说法。本研究旨在检查无家可归者和非无家可归者急诊科(ED)患者 COVID-19 的人口统计学和发病率。

方法

这是一项对 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 12 月在路易斯维尔大学医院急诊科(ULH ED)就诊的所有患者的回顾性研究,不包括 2020 年 1 月和 2 月的数据。数据来自肯塔基州无家可归者管理信息系统(HMIS)和 ULH 电子健康记录。

结果

在研究期间,共有 51532 名患者有 87869 次就诊,无家可归者就诊人数在此期间下降了 18.1%,与非无家可归者就诊人数的下降幅度相似(19.2%)。在总人群中,9471 人有已知的 COVID-19 检测结果,其中 610 人检测结果为阳性(阳性率为 6.4%)。在 712 名无家可归的 ED 患者中,有 39 人检测结果为阳性(阳性率为 5.5%)。在校正年龄、性别认同、种族和保险后,无家可归者和非无家可归者的检测阳性率无统计学差异,OR 为 1.23(0.88,1.73)。无家可归者入住重症监护病房(ICU)或住院的可能性较低(OR=0.55,95%CI:OR 0.51,0.60),而他们更有可能出院(OR=1.65,95%CI:1.52,1.79)。

结论

先前的文献表明,更高的疾病负担、缺乏社交距离以及卫生条件差会增加无家可归者感染 COVID-19 和出现严重疾病的风险。然而,本研究发现,无家可归并不是 COVID-19 感染的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
Equal incidence of COVID-19 among homeless and non-homeless ED patients when controlling for confounders.在控制混杂因素后, homeless 和 non-homeless ED 患者的 COVID-19 发病率相同。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:286.e5-286.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.057. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
2
Findings of a national dataset analysis on the visits of homeless patients to US emergency departments during 2005-2015.2005-2015 年美国无家可归患者就诊于急诊部的国家数据集分析结果。
Public Health. 2020 Jan;178:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
3
Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity in 20 homeless shelters in Toronto, Canada, from April to July 2020: a repeated cross-sectional study.2020 年 4 月至 7 月期间加拿大多伦多 20 家无家可归者收容所中与 SARS-CoV-2 阳性相关的因素:一项重复横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;9(1):E302-E308. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200253. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
4
Increased 30-Day Emergency Department Revisits Among Homeless Patients with Mental Health Conditions.患有精神疾病的无家可归患者30天内急诊复诊率增加。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):607-12. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.6.30690. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Testing, infection and complication rates of COVID-19 among people with a recent history of homelessness in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.在加拿大安大略省,有近期无家可归史的人群中 COVID-19 的检测、感染和并发症发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jan 11;9(1):E1-E9. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200287. Print 2021 Jan-Mar.
6
COVID-19 among people experiencing homelessness in England: a modelling study.英格兰无家可归人群中的 COVID-19:一项建模研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1181-1191. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30396-9. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Usage of unscheduled hospital care by homeless individuals in Dublin, Ireland: a cross-sectional study.爱尔兰都柏林无家可归者非计划住院治疗的使用情况:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 1;7(11):e016420. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016420.
8
Clinical Characteristics Associated with Return Visits to the Emergency Department after COVID-19 Diagnosis.临床特征与 COVID-19 诊断后急诊复诊相关。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 5;22(6):1257-1261. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.9.52824.
9
A 5-year comparison of ED visits by homeless and nonhomeless patients.对无家可归者和非无家可归者患者急诊就诊情况的5年比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May;34(5):805-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
10
Homelessness at discharge and its impact on psychiatric readmission and physician follow-up: a population-based cohort study.出院时的无家可归状况及其对精神科再入院和医生随访的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Mar 7;29:e21. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000052.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes for people experiencing homelessness with COVID-19 presenting to emergency departments in Canada, compared with housed patients.与有住所的患者相比,加拿大急诊科收治的感染新冠病毒的无家可归者的治疗结果。
CMAJ. 2025 Mar 10;197(9):E236-E243. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241282.
2
Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Influenza and SARS-CoV-2 in Homeless People from Urban Shelters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2023).城市收容所无家可归者中的呼吸道合胞病毒、流感和新型冠状病毒2:系统评价与荟萃分析(2023年)
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;5(1):41-79. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5010004.
3
Infectious Diseases Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Systematic Review of the Literature in the United States and Canada, 2003-2022.美国和加拿大 2003-2022 年流浪人群中传染病研究:文献系统性回顾
Public Health Rep. 2024 Sep-Oct;139(5):532-548. doi: 10.1177/00333549241228525. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
SARS-CoV-2 incidence, seroprevalence, and COVID-19 vaccination coverage in the homeless population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.SARS-CoV-2 感染率、血清流行率和无家可归人群中的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;11:1044788. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1044788. eCollection 2023.
5
The Impact of Being Homeless on the Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19: Systematic Review.新冠肺炎疫情期间无家可归对临床结局的影响:系统评价。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Sep 15;68:1605893. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605893. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessing COVID-19 risk among people experiencing homelessness-Correspondence.评估无家可归者中的新冠病毒疾病风险——通信
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:198-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.023. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Equal Incidence of COVID-19 among Homeless and Non-Homeless Emergency Department Patients.急诊科无家可归患者和非无家可归患者中新冠病毒病的发病率相同。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:409-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
8
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection Associates With Unstable Housing and Occurs in the Presence of Antibodies.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 再感染与住房不稳定有关,并在存在抗体的情况下发生。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e208-e215. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab940.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Vitamin D Levels, Race/Ethnicity, and Clinical Characteristics With COVID-19 Test Results.维生素 D 水平、种族/民族和临床特征与 COVID-19 检测结果的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e214117. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4117.
2
Vitamin D deficiency aggravates COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis.维生素 D 缺乏会加重 COVID-19:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(5):1308-1316. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1841090. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
3
COVID-19 and emergency care for adults experiencing homelessness.COVID-19 与无家可归成年人的急救护理。
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Dec;32(6):1084-1086. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13652. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
4
Prevalence of comorbidities among individuals with COVID-19: A rapid review of current literature.COVID-19 患者合并症的患病率:当前文献快速综述。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Feb;49(2):238-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.213. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
COVID-19 and the US response: accelerating health inequities.新冠疫情与美国的应对措施:加剧健康不平等现象
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Jun 3;26(4):176-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111426.
6
Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank.英国生物银行中的维生素D浓度与2019冠状病毒病感染情况
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Jul-Aug;14(4):561-565. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.050. Epub 2020 May 7.
7
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Prevalence in Homeless Shelters - Four U.S. Cities, March 27-April 15, 2020.评估无家可归者收容所中的 SARS-CoV-2 感染率-2020 年 3 月 27 日至 4 月 15 日,美国四个城市。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 1;69(17):521-522. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6917e1.
8
COVID-19 Outbreak Among Three Affiliated Homeless Service Sites - King County, Washington, 2020.2020 年,华盛顿州金县三个相关无家可归者服务点的 COVID-19 疫情爆发。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 1;69(17):523-526. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6917e2.
9
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Residents of a Large Homeless Shelter in Boston.波士顿一大型无家可归者收容所居民中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的流行情况。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2191-2192. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6887.
10
COVID-19: a potential public health problem for homeless populations.新型冠状病毒肺炎:无家可归人群面临的潜在公共卫生问题。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Apr;5(4):e186-e187. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30053-0. Epub 2020 Mar 11.