• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高管团队中非家族成员对研发投资的影响:来自中国家族企业的证据。

The influence of non-family members in top management teams on research and development investment: Evidence from Chinese family firms.

机构信息

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

Business School, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0258200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258200. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0258200
PMID:34624035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8500433/
Abstract

The diversified management ability of the non-family members in the top management teams (TMTs) can significantly increase the research and development (R&D) investment of the family firms. However, existing studies focus on family characteristics. To bridge the gap, this study explored the R&D investment propensity for family firms from the perspective of non-family members' participation in TMTs. Based on the upper echelons and the socioemotional wealth theory, this paper incorporated the non-economic goals that influence strategic decisions on family firms into the analytical framework. According to the questionnaire data of Chinese private enterprises, the Tobit regression model was used to analyze the influence of family members on R&D investment decisions under non-economic goal orientations. The results indicated that the preference for control and influence among family members weakens the positive effect of non-family managers on R&D investment, while the preferences for status perception and social responsibility strengthen the positive effect.

摘要

高管团队中非家族成员的多元化管理能力可以显著增加家族企业的研发投入。然而,现有研究主要关注家族特征。为了弥补这一差距,本研究从非家族成员参与高管团队的角度探讨了家族企业的研发投资倾向。基于高层梯队和社会情感财富理论,本文将影响家族企业战略决策的非经济目标纳入分析框架。根据中国私营企业的问卷调查数据,本文采用 Tobit 回归模型分析了非经济目标导向下家族成员对研发投资决策的影响。结果表明,家族成员对控制和影响的偏好削弱了非家族经理对研发投资的正向影响,而对地位感知和社会责任的偏好则增强了这种正向影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/72e7d2f04865/pone.0258200.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/f77979e7ee38/pone.0258200.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/9f8971e1d634/pone.0258200.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/3af76e3b5aec/pone.0258200.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/72e7d2f04865/pone.0258200.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/f77979e7ee38/pone.0258200.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/9f8971e1d634/pone.0258200.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/3af76e3b5aec/pone.0258200.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5687/8500433/72e7d2f04865/pone.0258200.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of non-family members in top management teams on research and development investment: Evidence from Chinese family firms.高管团队中非家族成员对研发投资的影响:来自中国家族企业的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0258200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258200. eCollection 2021.
2
Public funding and private investment for R&D: a survey in China's pharmaceutical industry.研发的公共资金和私人投资:中国制药业的调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jun 13;12:27. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-27.
3
Can rising labor costs boost private sector R&D investment? : Evidence from a survey of Chinese private firms.劳动力成本上升能否促进私营部门研发投资?:来自中国私营企业调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 4;17(8):e0268287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268287. eCollection 2022.
4
Family Exit and Firms' Investment Efficiency Based on Dynamic Changes: Evidence from Chinese Family Firms.基于动态变化的家族退出与企业投资效率——来自中国家族企业的证据。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 31;2022:7572891. doi: 10.1155/2022/7572891. eCollection 2022.
5
The Impact of the Consistency Evaluation Policy of Generic Drugs on R&D Investment Intensity of Pharmaceutical Companies-An Empirical Study Based on the Difference-in-Differences Model.仿制药一致性评价政策对制药企业研发投入强度的影响——基于双重差分模型的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:902025. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902025. eCollection 2022.
6
Value acceleration: lessons from private-equity masters.价值加速:来自私募股权大师们的经验教训。
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Jun;80(6):94-101, 153.
7
Socially responsible investing through the equity funds in the global ownership network.通过全球所有权网络中的股权基金进行社会责任投资。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256160. eCollection 2021.
8
Driving force of value reversal in Chinese overleveraged firms: The mechanism and path of private placement.中国过度杠杆化企业价值反转的驱动力:私募的机制和路径。
PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0303544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303544. eCollection 2024.
9
Absence of ultimate controller and investment efficiency: Evidence from China.无终极控制股东与投资效率:来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287615. eCollection 2023.
10
The impacts of economy policy uncertainty on peer effects of firms R&D investment: Based on LDA machine learning and regression statistical modeling approach.经济政策不确定性对企业研发投资的同行效应的影响:基于 LDA 机器学习和回归统计建模方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0305715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305715. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of top management team tenure heterogeneity on innovation efficiency of declining firms.高层管理团队任期异质性对衰退型企业创新效率的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0313624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313624. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavior Towards R&D Investment of Family Firms CEOs: The Role of Psychological Attribute.家族企业首席执行官对研发投资的行为:心理属性的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 May 26;14:595-620. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S306443. eCollection 2021.
2
The role of foreign technologies and R&D in innovation processes within catching-up CEE countries.在追赶型中欧和东欧国家的创新过程中,外国技术和研发的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250307. eCollection 2021.
3
The determinant factors for the adoption of CRM in the Palestinian SMEs: The moderating effect of firm size.
采用客户关系管理(CRM)的决定因素:企业规模的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0243355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243355. eCollection 2021.
4
The effectiveness of internal control and innovation performance: An intermediary effect based on corporate social responsibility.内部控制与创新绩效:基于企业社会责任的中介效应。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234506. eCollection 2020.
5
Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor.社会阶层、唯我论和语境主义:富人与穷人的不同之处。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;119(3):546-72. doi: 10.1037/a0028756.