Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):609-621. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17495. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
Certain racial/ethnic minority groups have a higher risk of developing dementia, yet studies have demonstrated that they often have limited knowledge and understanding of this disease. An increasing number of educational and advocacy programs have been developed to promote dementia knowledge. We aimed at assessing current evidence and quality regarding educational interventions for promoting dementia knowledge.
We searched for intervention studies published in English that focused on educational interventions for promoting dementia knowledge among racial/ethnic minority groups. We identified 25 relevant studies through PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus, using tailored search terms. We screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full texts, synthesized relevant evidence, and evaluated the studies' quality based on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Relevant intervention studies took place in communities, hospitals or clinics, and schools, and online.
Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 21), followed by the UK (n = 3). Over half of the studies included Asian/Pacific Islander groups (n = 14), followed by Black groups (n = 12) and Hispanic groups (n = 11). The intervention delivery mode varied across studies-from workshops hosted in a faith community to talk shows on YouTube. Target populations included middle-aged and older adults, caregivers and family members, health students and professionals, and elementary school students. Common content included symptoms and signs of dementia, protective and risk factors, and local resources. The assessment of study outcomes varied across studies. Improvement in dementia knowledge and attitudes towards dementia was reported in many studies. Among the included studies, intervention satisfaction was high. The overall quality of the interventions was low.
Formally evaluated educational interventions promoting dementia knowledge are at an early stage. Existing published interventions showed adequate acceptability and promise in promoting better understanding and awareness of dementia in minority groups. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed.
某些少数族裔群体患痴呆症的风险较高,但研究表明,他们对这种疾病的了解往往有限。为了提高对痴呆症的认识,越来越多的教育和宣传计划已经开发出来。我们旨在评估目前关于促进少数族裔痴呆症知识的教育干预措施的证据和质量。
我们通过 PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Scopus 搜索了以促进少数族裔痴呆症知识为重点的教育干预措施的英文发表的干预研究。我们使用定制的搜索词,确定了 25 项相关研究。我们筛选了标题和摘要,审查了全文,综合了相关证据,并根据混合方法评估工具评估了研究的质量。相关干预研究在社区、医院或诊所以及学校和网上进行。
大多数研究在美国进行(n=21),其次是英国(n=3)。超过一半的研究包括亚洲/太平洋岛民群体(n=14),其次是黑人群体(n=12)和西班牙裔群体(n=11)。研究的干预交付模式各不相同——从在一个信仰社区举办的讲习班到 YouTube 上的脱口秀。目标人群包括中老年人、照顾者和家庭成员、卫生专业学生和专业人员以及小学生。常见的内容包括痴呆症的症状和体征、保护和危险因素以及当地资源。研究结果的评估在不同的研究中也有所不同。许多研究报告了痴呆症知识和对痴呆症态度的改善。在纳入的研究中,干预满意度很高。干预措施的整体质量较低。
正式评估的促进痴呆症知识的教育干预措施处于早期阶段。现有的已发表的干预措施在促进少数群体对痴呆症的更好理解和认识方面表现出足够的可接受性和前景。需要更多设计良好的随机对照试验。