Suppr超能文献

高频喷射通气系统在咽喉及气管手术中的应用

[Application of high frequency jet ventilation system in laryngopharyngeal and tracheal surgery].

作者信息

Kuang Shixin, Wei Xudong, Yan Wenjun

机构信息

Graduate student,Grade 2018,Ningxia Medical University,Lanzhou,730000,China.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Gansu Provincial Hospital.

出版信息

Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct;35(10):896-900. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.10.007.

Abstract

The effectiveness and safety of high frequency ventilation system in laryngopharyngeal and tracheal surgery is discussed. According to The American Society of Anesthesiologists Ⅰ-Ⅱ level, 60 cases of selective throat and tracheal surgery undering general anesthesia were randomly divided into high frequency jet ventilation group (group HFJV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation group (IPPV group), with 30 cases in each group. Group HFJV was treated with HFJV and group IPPV with a small caliber endotracheal tube connected to an anesthesia machine was treated with IPPV.Before anesthesia (T0), after the success of the laryngoscope placed (T1), 5 minites after ventilation (T2) and 5 minites after the laryngoscope removed (T3), hemodynamic parameters were recorded at each time point , in T0, T2 and T3 record , arterial blood gas index, the patient's airway pressure, end-expiratory carbon dioxide concentration, surgical field quality and total blood loss, operating time and awakening time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The average airway pressure and intraoperative average total blood loss of group HFJV were significantly lower than that of group IPPV(<0.01), and the average operative field quality of group HFJV was significantly better(<0.01), but there was no statistical significance in the effects on hemodynamics, arterial blood gas and other indicators compared with group IPPV(>0.05). No serious adverse events occurred in 2 groups. HFJV system can be used effectively in laryngopharyngeal and tracheal surgery, reducing intraoperative blood loss and improving surgical field of vision without obvious adverse reactions.

摘要

探讨高频通气系统在咽喉及气管手术中的有效性和安全性。根据美国麻醉医师协会Ⅰ-Ⅱ级,将60例择期行咽喉及气管手术的全身麻醉患者随机分为高频喷射通气组(HFJV组)和间歇正压通气组(IPPV组),每组30例。HFJV组采用高频喷射通气治疗,IPPV组采用连接麻醉机的小口径气管导管行间歇正压通气治疗。于麻醉前(T0)、喉镜置入成功后(T1)、通气5分钟后(T2)及喉镜拔除后5分钟(T3)各时间点记录血流动力学参数,于T0、T2及T3记录时,记录动脉血气指标、患者气道压力、呼气末二氧化碳浓度、手术视野质量及总失血量、手术时间和苏醒时间,并比较两组间差异。HFJV组的平均气道压力及术中平均总失血量明显低于IPPV组(<0.01),HFJV组的平均手术视野质量明显优于IPPV组(<0.01),但与IPPV组比较,对血流动力学、动脉血气等指标的影响差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组均未发生严重不良事件。高频喷射通气系统可有效应用于咽喉及气管手术,减少术中失血,改善手术视野,且无明显不良反应。

相似文献

1
[Application of high frequency jet ventilation system in laryngopharyngeal and tracheal surgery].高频喷射通气系统在咽喉及气管手术中的应用
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct;35(10):896-900. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.10.007.

本文引用的文献

3
..
F1000Res. 2017 May 30;6:756. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10823.1. eCollection 2017.
6
Jet ventilation for surgical interventions in the upper airway.用于上呼吸道手术干预的喷射通气。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2010 Sep;28(3):397-409. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
7
Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost?正压通气:实际成本是多少?
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):446-57. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen240.
8
The influence of PEEP and tidal volume on central blood volume.呼气末正压和潮气量对中心血容量的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Nov;23(11):954-61. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000925. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
10
Controlled hypotension for spinal surgery.脊柱手术中的控制性低血压
Eur Spine J. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S66-71. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0756-7. Epub 2004 Jun 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验