All at the Institution for Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 Oct;65(9):1248-1253. doi: 10.1111/aas.13930. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
High-frequency jet ventilation is necessary to reduce organ movements during stereotactic liver ablation. However, post-operative hypertensive episodes especially following irreversible electroporation ablation compared with microwave ablation initiated this study. The hypothesis was that hypertensive episodes could be related to ventilation or ablation method.
The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the proportion of patients with hypertensive events during recovery following liver ablation under general anaesthesia and to analyse the relation to ventilation and ablation technique. A medical chart review of 134 patients undergoing either high-frequency jet ventilation and microwave ablation (n = 45), high-frequency jet ventilation and irreversible electroporation (n = 44), or conventional ventilation and microwave ablation (n = 45) was performed. The proportion of patients with at least one episode of systolic arterial pressure 140-160, 160-180 or >180 mmHg during early recovery and the impact of ventilation method was studied.
Out of 134 patients, 100, 75 and 34 patients had at least one episode of mild, moderate and severe hypertension. Microwave ablation, as well as high frequency jet ventilation, was associated with an increased odds ratio for post-operative hypertension. The proportion of patients with at least one severe hypertensive event was 18/45, 9/44 and 7/45, respectively.
Both ventilation and ablation technique had an impact on post-operative hypertensive episodes. The microwave ablation/high-frequency jet ventilation combination increased the risk as compared with irreversible electroporation/high-frequency jet ventilation and microwave ablation/conventional ventilation.
立体定向肝脏消融术需要高频喷射通气以减少器官运动。然而,与微波消融相比,不可逆电穿孔消融术后尤其是高血压发作,引发了这项研究。假设高血压发作可能与通气或消融方法有关。
本回顾性研究旨在评估全麻下肝脏消融术后恢复期间高血压事件患者的比例,并分析与通气和消融技术的关系。对 134 例接受高频喷射通气和微波消融(n=45)、高频喷射通气和不可逆电穿孔(n=44)或常规通气和微波消融(n=45)的患者进行了病历回顾。研究了至少出现一次收缩压 140-160mmHg、160-180mmHg 或 >180mmHg 的患者比例,以及通气方式的影响。
在 134 例患者中,100、75 和 34 例患者分别至少出现一次轻度、中度和重度高血压。微波消融和高频喷射通气均与术后高血压的发生几率增加相关。分别有 18/45、9/44 和 7/45 的患者出现至少一次严重高血压事件。
通气和消融技术均对术后高血压事件有影响。与不可逆电穿孔/高频喷射通气和微波消融/常规通气相比,微波消融/高频喷射通气组合增加了风险。