Huang Pei, Correia Marta M, Rua Catarina, Rodgers Christopher T, Henson Richard N, Carlin Johan D
Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A∗STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 22;15:715549. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.715549. eCollection 2021.
The arrival of submillimeter ultra high-field fMRI makes it possible to compare activation profiles across cortical layers. However, the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal measured by gradient echo (GE) fMRI is biased toward superficial layers of the cortex, which is a serious confound for laminar analysis. Several univariate and multivariate analysis methods have been proposed to correct this bias. We compare these methods using computational simulations of 7T fMRI data from regions of interest (ROI) during a visual attention paradigm. We also tested the methods on a pilot dataset of human 7T fMRI data. The simulations show that two methods-the ratio of ROI means across conditions and a novel application of Deming regression-offer the most robust correction for superficial bias. Deming regression has the additional advantage that it does not require that the conditions differ in their mean activation over voxels within an ROI. When applied to the pilot dataset, we observed strikingly different layer profiles when different attention metrics were used, but were unable to discern any differences in laminar attention across layers when Deming regression or ROI ratio was applied. Our simulations demonstrates that accurate correction of superficial bias is crucial to avoid drawing erroneous conclusions from laminar analyses of GE fMRI data, and this is affirmed by the results from our pilot 7T fMRI data.
亚毫米超高场功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的出现使得比较跨皮质层的激活模式成为可能。然而,梯度回波(GE)fMRI测量的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号偏向于皮质的表层,这对层流分析来说是一个严重的混淆因素。已经提出了几种单变量和多变量分析方法来校正这种偏差。我们使用视觉注意力范式期间来自感兴趣区域(ROI)的7T fMRI数据的计算模拟来比较这些方法。我们还在人类7T fMRI数据的一个试验数据集上测试了这些方法。模拟结果表明,两种方法——跨条件的ROI均值之比和Deming回归的一种新应用——对表层偏差提供了最稳健的校正。Deming回归还有一个额外的优点,即它不要求各条件在ROI内体素的平均激活上存在差异。当应用于试验数据集时,我们发现使用不同的注意力指标时,层状分布存在显著差异,但应用Deming回归或ROI比率时,我们无法辨别各层之间在层流注意力上的任何差异。我们的模拟表明,准确校正表层偏差对于避免从GE fMRI数据的层流分析中得出错误结论至关重要,我们的7T fMRI试验数据结果也证实了这一点。