Suppr超能文献

大麻与驾驶

Cannabis and Driving.

作者信息

Pearlson Godfrey D, Stevens Michael C, D'Souza Deepak Cyril

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford Healthcare Corporation, Hartford, CT, United States.

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 24;12:689444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689444. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

As more states in the U.S legalize recreational and medicinal cannabis, rates of driving under the influence of this drug are increasing significantly. Aspects of this emerging public health issue potentially pit science against public policy. The authors believe that the legal cart is currently significantly ahead of the scientific horse. Issues such as detection procedures for cannabis-impaired drivers, and use of blood THC levels to gauge impairment, should rely heavily on current scientific knowledge. However, there are many, often unacknowledged research gaps in these and related areas, that need to be addressed in order provide a more coherent basis for public policies. This review focuses especially on those areas. In this article we review in a focused manner, current information linking cannabis to motor vehicle accidents and examine patterns of cannabis-impairment of driving related behaviors, their time courses, relationship to cannabis dose and THC blood levels, and compare cannabis and alcohol-impaired driving patterns directly. This review also delves into questions of alcohol-cannabis combinations and addresses the basis for of limits in cannabis driving convictions. Finally, we distinguish between areas where research has provided clear answers to the above questions, areas that remain unclear, and make recommendations to fill gaps in current knowledge.

摘要

随着美国越来越多的州将娱乐性和药用大麻合法化,在这种药物影响下驾驶的发生率正在显著上升。这个新出现的公共卫生问题的一些方面可能使科学与公共政策产生冲突。作者认为,目前法律的马车远远领先于科学的马匹。诸如大麻影响下驾驶者的检测程序,以及使用血液中四氢大麻酚(THC)水平来衡量损伤程度等问题,应该在很大程度上依赖当前的科学知识。然而,在这些以及相关领域存在许多往往未被承认的研究空白,需要加以解决,以便为公共政策提供更连贯的基础。本综述特别关注这些领域。在本文中,我们重点回顾了将大麻与机动车事故联系起来的当前信息,并研究了大麻影响下驾驶相关行为的模式、它们的时间进程、与大麻剂量和血液中THC水平的关系,并直接比较了大麻和酒精影响下的驾驶模式。本综述还深入探讨了酒精与大麻混合使用的问题,并阐述了大麻驾驶定罪限制的依据。最后,我们区分了研究已经为上述问题提供明确答案的领域、仍不明确的领域,并提出填补当前知识空白的建议。

相似文献

1
Cannabis and Driving.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 24;12:689444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689444. eCollection 2021.
2
Correlation between oral fluid and blood THC concentration: A systematic review and discussion of policy implications.
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Aug;173:106694. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106694. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
The failings of limits to detect cannabis-induced driving impairment: Results from a simulated driving study.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):102-107. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1851685. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
4
Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Feb 7;73(2):109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.10.008.
5
Police documentation of drug use in injured drivers: Implications for monitoring and preventing drug-impaired driving.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
6
Cannabis and its effects on driving skills.
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Nov;268:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Cannabis use: a perspective in relation to the proposed UK drug-driving legislation.
Drug Test Anal. 2014 Jan-Feb;6(1-2):143-54. doi: 10.1002/dta.1588. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Cannabis use and driving under the influence: Behaviors and attitudes by state-level legal sale of recreational cannabis.
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106320. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106320. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Roadside screening tests for cannabis use: A systematic review.
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 22;9(4):e14630. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14630. eCollection 2023 Apr.

引用本文的文献

2
The Impact of Intoxication on the Prognosis of High-Speed Motor Vehicle Accidents: A Tertiary Care Center Experience.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 22;13(1):e13. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v13i1.2427. eCollection 2025.
3
Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar;275(2):281-292. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01880-2. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
4
Intoxication due to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol is characterized by disrupted prefrontal cortex activity.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Aug;49(9):1481-1490. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01876-5. Epub 2024 May 7.
6
Latent Trajectories of Persistence of Cannabis Use Across Four Decades in 329 Men From the San Diego Prospective Study.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jul;85(4):555-564. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00363. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Can inhaled cannabis users accurately evaluate impaired driving ability? A randomized controlled trial.
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;11:1234765. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1234765. eCollection 2023.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Roadside Drug Testing Approaches.
Molecules. 2021 May 29;26(11):3291. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113291.
3
Effects of High-Potency Cannabis on Psychomotor Performance in Frequent Cannabis Users.
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022 Feb;7(1):107-115. doi: 10.1089/can.2020.0048. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
The failings of limits to detect cannabis-induced driving impairment: Results from a simulated driving study.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):102-107. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1851685. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
A Comprehensive Review of Cannabis Potency in the United States in the Last Decade.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021 Jun;6(6):603-606. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验