• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于朴素贝叶斯网络的肿瘤生物学和医疗保健因素对乳腺癌诊断分期种族差异的贡献分析。

Naïve Bayesian network-based contribution analysis of tumor biology and healthcare factors to racial disparity in breast cancer stage-at-diagnosis.

作者信息

Luo Yi, Carretta Henry, Lee Inkoo, LeBlanc Gabrielle, Sinha Debajyoti, Rust George

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, College of Medicine, Florida State University, 1115 West Call Street, Tallahassee, FL USA.

Department of Statistics, Florida State University, 117 N. Woodward Ave., Tallahassee, FL USA.

出版信息

Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Sep 24;9(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00165-5. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s13755-021-00165-5
PMID:34631040
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8463645/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variation in breast cancer stage at initial diagnosis (including racial disparities) is driven both by tumor biology and healthcare factors.

METHODS

We studied women age 67-74 with initial diagnosis of breast cancer from 2006 through 2014 in the SEER-Medicare database. We extracted variables related to tumor biology (histologic grade and hormone receptor status) and healthcare factors (screening mammography [SM] utilization and time delay from mammography to diagnostic biopsy). We used naïve Bayesian networks (NBNs) to illustrate the relationships among patient-specific factors and stage-at-diagnosis for African American (AA) and white patients separately. After identifying and controlling confounders, we conducted counterfactual inference through the NBN, resulting in an unbiased evaluation of the causal effects of individual factors on the expected utility of stage-at-diagnosis. An NBN-based decomposition mechanism was developed to evaluate the contributions of each patient-specific factor to an actual racial disparity in stage-at-diagnosis. 2000 bootstrap samples from our training patients were used to compute the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of these contributions.

RESULTS

Using a causal-effect contribution analysis, the relative contributions of each patient-specific factor to the actual racial disparity in stage-at-diagnosis were as follows: tumor grade, 45.1% (95% CI: 44.5%, 45.8%); hormone receptor status, 5.0% (4.5%, 5.4%); mammography utilization, 23.1% (22.4%, 24.0%); and biopsy delay 26.8% (26.1%, 27.3%).

CONCLUSION

The modifiable mechanisms of mammography utilization and biopsy delay drive about 49.9% of racial difference in stage-at-diagnosis, potentially guiding more targeted interventions to eliminate cancer outcome disparities.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13755-021-00165-5.

摘要

背景

初次诊断时乳腺癌分期的差异(包括种族差异)是由肿瘤生物学和医疗保健因素共同驱动的。

方法

我们在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据库中研究了2006年至2014年期间初次诊断为乳腺癌的67至74岁女性。我们提取了与肿瘤生物学(组织学分级和激素受体状态)和医疗保健因素(乳腺钼靶筛查[SM]的使用情况以及从乳腺钼靶检查到诊断性活检的时间延迟)相关的变量。我们分别使用朴素贝叶斯网络(NBN)来说明非裔美国(AA)患者和白人患者的特定患者因素与诊断时分期之间的关系。在识别和控制混杂因素后,我们通过NBN进行反事实推理,从而对个体因素对诊断时分期预期效用的因果效应进行无偏评估。我们开发了一种基于NBN的分解机制,以评估每个特定患者因素对诊断时分期实际种族差异的贡献。我们使用来自训练患者的2000个自助抽样样本计算这些贡献的95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

通过因果效应贡献分析,每个特定患者因素对诊断时分期实际种族差异的相对贡献如下:肿瘤分级,45.1%(95%CI:44.5%,45.8%);激素受体状态,5.0%(4.5%,5.4%);乳腺钼靶检查的使用情况,23.1%(22.4%,24.0%);活检延迟,26.8%(26.1%,27.3%)。

结论

乳腺钼靶检查的使用情况和活检延迟这些可改变的机制导致了约49.9%的诊断时分期种族差异,这可能为更有针对性的干预措施提供指导,以消除癌症结局差异。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13755-021-00165-5获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Naïve Bayesian network-based contribution analysis of tumor biology and healthcare factors to racial disparity in breast cancer stage-at-diagnosis.基于朴素贝叶斯网络的肿瘤生物学和医疗保健因素对乳腺癌诊断分期种族差异的贡献分析。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Sep 24;9(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00165-5. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Latent pathway-based Bayesian models to identify intervenable factors of racial disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis.基于潜在途径的贝叶斯模型,以确定诊断时乳腺癌分期的种族差异中的可干预因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):253-263. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01785-w. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Association of Social Determinants and Tumor Biology With Racial Disparity in Survival From Early-Stage, Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer.社会决定因素和肿瘤生物学与早期激素依赖性乳腺癌生存的种族差异相关。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):536-545. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7705.
4
Multiple mediation analysis of racial disparity in breast cancer survival.乳腺癌生存中种族差异的多重中介分析。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;79:102206. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102206. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
5
Effects of Cancer Stage and Treatment Differences on Racial Disparities in Survival From Colon Cancer: A United States Population-Based Study.癌症分期和治疗差异对结肠癌生存种族差异的影响:一项基于美国人群的研究
Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(5):1135-1146. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.030. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
6
Racial disparities in surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors.老年乳腺癌幸存者监测乳房 X 光检查中的种族差异。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;176(2):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05250-8. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
7
Racial disparities in the development of breast cancer metastases among older women: a multilevel study.老年女性乳腺癌转移发展中的种族差异:一项多层次研究。
Cancer. 2009 Feb 15;115(4):731-40. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24087.
8
Racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer survival: how much is explained by screening, tumor severity, biology, treatment, comorbidities, and demographics?乳腺癌生存率的种族和族裔差异:筛查、肿瘤严重程度、生物学特性、治疗、合并症及人口统计学因素能解释多少?
Cancer. 2008 Jan 1;112(1):171-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23131.
9
Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?乳腺钼靶筛查的应用能否解释乳腺癌的种族和民族差异?
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):541-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00004.
10
Identifying risk factors for disparities in breast cancer mortality among African-American and Hispanic women.确定非裔美国人和西班牙裔妇女乳腺癌死亡率差异的风险因素。
Womens Health Issues. 2012 May-Jun;22(3):e267-76. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian inference in racial health inequity analyses for noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review.非传染性疾病种族健康不平等分析中的贝叶斯推断:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 10;14(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02898-w.
2
Survival differences in malignant meningiomas: a latent class analysis using SEER data.恶性脑膜瘤的生存差异:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据的潜在类别分析
Discov Oncol. 2025 Feb 27;16(1):250. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02016-1.
3
Inherent Bias in Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review of Sources of Bias.电子健康记录中的固有偏差:偏差来源的范围综述
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 12:2024.04.09.24305594. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.09.24305594.
4
Social determinants of health and health inequities in breast cancer screening: a scoping review.社会决定因素与乳腺癌筛查中的健康不平等:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;12:1354717. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354717. eCollection 2024.
5
A Bayesian network perspective on neonatal pneumonia in pregnant women with diabetes mellitus.基于贝叶斯网络的视角研究孕妇糖尿病与新生儿肺炎的关系。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02070-9.
6
Clinical Informatics Approaches to Understand and Address Cancer Disparities.临床信息学方法在理解和解决癌症差异中的应用。
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):121-130. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742511. Epub 2022 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The American Cancer Society's Facts & Figures: 2020 Edition.美国癌症协会《2020年事实与数据》版
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2020 Mar;11(2):135-136. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2020.11.2.1. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
2
Factors Associated with 5-Year Costs of Care among a Cohort of Alcohol Use Disorder Patients: A Bayesian Network Model.酒精使用障碍患者队列中与5年护理成本相关的因素:贝叶斯网络模型
Healthc Inform Res. 2020 Apr;26(2):129-145. doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.2.129. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Socioeconomic Status and Ovarian Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A Study Nested Within UKCTOCS.社会经济地位与确诊时的卵巢癌分期:一项嵌套于英国卵巢癌筛查协作试验中的研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Feb 7;10(2):89. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10020089.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in patient experiences with health care in association with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis: findings from the SEER-CAHPS data.种族/民族差异与乳腺癌诊断早期阶段相关的患者在医疗保健方面的体验:来自 SEER-CAHPS 数据的发现。
Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Jan;31(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01254-3. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Principles of confounder selection.混杂因素选择原则。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):211-219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
6
Methodological Approaches to Understanding Causes of Health Disparities.理解健康差异成因的方法学途径。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S28-S33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304843.
7
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II detection by Naïve Bayes Classifier: An example of patient classification for a rare disease using electronic medical records from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.基于朴素贝叶斯分类器的黏多糖贮积症 II 型检测:利用加拿大初级保健监测网络的电子病历对罕见病患者进行分类的范例。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0209018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209018. eCollection 2018.
8
Racial/ethnic differences in the outcomes of patients with metastatic breast cancer: contributions of demographic, socioeconomic, tumor and metastatic characteristics.转移性乳腺癌患者结局的种族/民族差异:人口统计学、社会经济学、肿瘤和转移特征的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(1):225-237. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4956-y. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
9
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Survival: The Contribution of Stage, Treatment, and Ancestry.肺癌生存中的种族差异:分期、治疗和祖源的贡献。
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Oct;13(10):1464-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.032. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
Deconstructing a disparity: explaining excess preterm birth among U.S.-born black women.剖析差异:解释美国本土黑人女性中早产儿比例过高的原因。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):225-230. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 2.