Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Mar;78(3):645-665. doi: 10.1111/jan.15065. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
To evaluate the different types of virtual reality (VR) therapy received by adult patients undergoing surgical procedures in acute care settings and the outcome measures, as well as to highlight the acceptability and feasibility of VR approaches among patients and healthcare workers.
Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method guided the analysis.
Searches were conducted in ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Wiley Online Library, Medline, PsycINFO and PubMed and Google Scholar from 2000 to June 2021.
A systematic search on articles published in English was carried out with electronic databases and hand search references. Keywords searched included primary qualitative and quantitative studies that utilized VR therapy in surgical care settings.
Eighteen articles were reviewed, which reported the use of two main strategies: guided and interactive imagery therapy. The findings identified: (i) patient-clinical outcome measures including the use of analgesics, vital signs, functional capacity and length of hospital stay; and (ii) patient-reported experience measures including pain, anxiety and satisfaction level. Comfort, age, knowledge and attitude were key factors influencing the acceptability of VR among the patients, whereas cost-effectiveness and infection control were two main factors affecting the feasibility of use among the health care workers.
VR therapy demonstrated potential improvements in both the patient-clinical outcomes and patient-reported experiences of those undergoing surgical procedures. However, the findings were inconsistent, which required further research to explore and establish the effectiveness of using VR in the context of acute care settings.
VR distraction has been increasingly used as a non-pharmacological method in managing pain, easing anxiety and optimizing other associated outcomes in patients undergoing surgical procedures. It is essential to examine the effectiveness of VR therapy on the adult patients' outcomes in acute care settings with surgical procedures, as well as its acceptability and feasibility of use.
评估成人患者在急性护理环境下接受手术治疗时所接受的不同类型的虚拟现实 (VR) 疗法以及评估结果,同时强调患者和医护人员对 VR 方法的接受度和可行性。
Whittemore 和 Knafl 的综合评价方法指导了分析过程。
2000 年至 2021 年 6 月,在 ScienceDirect、ProQuest、Wiley Online Library、Medline、PsycINFO 和 PubMed 以及 Google Scholar 上进行了检索。
通过电子数据库和手工检索参考文献对发表于英文文献的文章进行了系统检索,检索关键词包括在外科护理环境中使用 VR 治疗的主要定性和定量研究。
共评价了 18 篇文章,报道了两种主要策略的使用情况:引导式和互动意象疗法。研究结果确定:(i) 患者-临床结果评估指标包括使用镇痛药、生命体征、功能能力和住院时间;以及 (ii) 患者报告的体验评估指标包括疼痛、焦虑和满意度。舒适度、年龄、知识和态度是影响患者对 VR 接受度的关键因素,而成本效益和感染控制是影响医护人员使用可行性的两个主要因素。
VR 疗法在接受手术治疗的患者的临床结果和患者报告的体验方面均显示出潜在的改善。然而,研究结果并不一致,需要进一步研究来探索和确定 VR 在急性护理环境中的有效性。
VR 分散注意力已越来越多地作为一种非药物方法,用于管理疼痛、缓解焦虑和优化接受手术治疗的患者的其他相关结果。在有手术治疗的急性护理环境中,评估 VR 疗法对成人患者结局的有效性以及其使用的接受度和可行性至关重要。