Bird Sarah, Derry Sheena, Moore R Andrew
Lincoln College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 21;2014(5):CD008616. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008616.pub2.
Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services, and society. Zolmitriptan is an abortive medication for migraine attacks, belonging to the triptan family. These medicines work in a different way to analgesics such as paracetamol and ibuprofen.
To determine the efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in adults.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Oxford Pain Relief Database, together with three online databases (www.astrazenecaclinicaltrials.com, www.clinicaltrials.gov, and apps.who.int/trialsearch) for studies to 12 March 2014. We also searched the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews.
We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm, using zolmitriptan to treat a migraine headache episode.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate risk ratios and numbers needed to treat for an additional beneficial effect (NNT) or harmful effect (NNH) compared with placebo or a different active treatment.
Twenty-five studies (20,162 participants) compared zolmitriptan with placebo or an active comparator. The evidence from placebo-controlled studies was of high quality for all outcomes except 24 hour outcomes and serious adverse events where only limited data were available. The majority of included studies were at a low risk of performance, detection and attrition biases, but did not adequately describe methods of randomisation and concealment.Most of the data were for the 2.5 mg and 5 mg doses compared with placebo, for treatment of moderate to severe pain. For all efficacy outcomes, zolmitriptan surpassed placebo. For oral zolmitriptan 2.5 mg versus placebo, the NNTs were 5.0, 3.2, 7.7, and 4.1 for pain-free at two hours, headache relief at two hours, sustained pain-free during the 24 hours postdose, and sustained headache relief during the 24 hours postdose, respectively. Results for the oral 5 mg dose were similar to the 2.5 mg dose, while zolmitriptan 10 mg was significantly more effective than 5 mg for pain-free and headache relief at two hours. For headache relief at one and two hours and sustained headache relief during the 24 hours postdose, but not pain-free at two hours, zolmitriptan 5 mg nasal spray was significantly more effective than the 5 mg oral tablet.For the most part, adverse events were transient and mild and were more common with zolmitriptan than placebo, with a clear dose response relationship (1 mg to 10 mg).High quality evidence from two studies showed that oral zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg provided headache relief at two hours to the same proportion of people as oral sumatriptan 50 mg (66%, 67%, and 68% respectively), although not necessarily the same individuals. There was no significant difference in numbers experiencing adverse events. Single studies reported on other active treatment comparisons but are not described further because of the small amount of data.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Zolmitriptan is effective as an abortive treatment for migraine attacks for some people, but is associated with increased adverse events compared to placebo. Zolmitriptan 2.5 mg and 5 mg benefited the same proportion of people as sumatriptan 50 mg, although not necessarily the same individuals, for headache relief at two hours.
偏头痛是一种常见的致残性疾病,给个人、医疗服务机构和社会都带来了负担。佐米曲普坦是一种用于偏头痛发作的终止性药物,属于曲坦类药物。这些药物的作用方式与对乙酰氨基酚和布洛芬等镇痛药不同。
确定与安慰剂及其他活性干预措施相比,佐米曲普坦治疗成人急性偏头痛发作的疗效和耐受性。
我们检索了考克兰图书馆中的考克兰对照试验中央登记库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE和牛津疼痛缓解数据库,以及三个在线数据库(www.astrazenecaclinicaltrials.com、www.clinicaltrials.gov和apps.who.int/trialsearch),检索截至2014年3月12日的研究。我们还检索了纳入研究的参考文献列表和相关综述。
我们纳入了随机、双盲、安慰剂对照或活性对照研究,每个治疗组至少有10名参与者,使用佐米曲普坦治疗偏头痛发作。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。我们使用达到各结局的参与者数量来计算风险比,以及与安慰剂或不同活性治疗相比产生额外有益效果(NNT)或有害效果(NNH)所需治疗的人数。
25项研究(20162名参与者)将佐米曲普坦与安慰剂或活性对照进行了比较。除24小时结局和严重不良事件仅有有限数据外,安慰剂对照研究的证据在所有结局方面质量都很高。大多数纳入研究在实施、检测和失访偏倚方面风险较低,但未充分描述随机化和隐匿方法。大多数数据是关于2.5毫克和5毫克剂量与安慰剂相比,用于治疗中度至重度疼痛。在所有疗效结局方面,佐米曲普坦均优于安慰剂。口服佐米曲普坦2.5毫克与安慰剂相比,两小时无痛、两小时头痛缓解、给药后24小时持续无痛以及给药后24小时持续头痛缓解的NNT分别为5.0、3.2、7.7和4.1。口服5毫克剂量的结果与2.5毫克剂量相似,而佐米曲普坦10毫克在两小时无痛和头痛缓解方面比5毫克显著更有效。对于一和两小时的头痛缓解以及给药后24小时的持续头痛缓解,但两小时无痛情况除外,佐米曲普坦5毫克鼻喷雾剂比5毫克口服片剂显著更有效。在大多数情况下,不良事件是短暂且轻微的,佐米曲普坦组比安慰剂组更常见,且有明确的剂量反应关系(1毫克至10毫克)。两项研究的高质量证据表明,口服佐米曲普坦2.5毫克和5毫克在两小时时使头痛缓解的人群比例与口服舒马曲坦50毫克相同(分别为66%、67%和68%),尽管不一定是相同个体。发生不良事件的人数没有显著差异。单项研究报告了与其他活性治疗的比较,但由于数据量少未作进一步描述。
佐米曲普坦作为偏头痛发作的终止性治疗对一些人有效,但与安慰剂相比不良事件增加。佐米曲普坦2.5毫克和5毫克在两小时头痛缓解方面使相同比例的人受益,与舒马曲坦50毫克相同,尽管不一定是相同个体。