• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种可行且敏感的奶牛判断偏差任务。

Developing a feasible and sensitive judgement bias task in dairy cows.

机构信息

Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):425-445. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01563-8. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-021-01563-8
PMID:34633570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8940804/
Abstract

Judgement bias tasks (JBTs) are used to assess the influence of farm practices on livestock affective states. The tasks must be adjusted to the species and age group of focus. In cattle, most JBTs were designed for calves instead of adult cows. This study aimed to develop a JBT suitable for adult dairy cows, combining feasibility, validity, sensitivity and repeatability. Three JBTs were developed in which cows were trained to reach or avoid reaching a feeder, the location of which signalled a reward or punisher. The tasks differed in terms of punisher-cows being allocated either to "no-reward", an air puff or an electric shock. Cows were then exposed twice to three ambiguous positions of the feeder, on two separate occasions. Speed of learning and proportions of correct responses to the conditioned locations were used to assess the feasibility of the task. Adjusted latencies to reach the ambiguous feeder positions were used to examine whether response patterns matched the linear and monotonic graded pattern expected in a valid and sensitive JBT at baseline. Latencies to reach the feeders in the two repeated testing sessions were compared to assess ambiguity loss over tasks' repetitions. The validity of using spatial JBTs for dairy cows was demonstrated. While the effect on JBT feasibility was nuanced, the punisher did influence JBT sensitivity. None of the JBTs' repeatability could be supported. We conclude that using an air puf as punisher led to the most sensitive, yet non-repeatable, JBT for dairy cows.

摘要

判断偏差任务(JBT)用于评估农场实践对牲畜情感状态的影响。这些任务必须根据关注的物种和年龄组进行调整。在牛中,大多数 JBT 是为小牛设计的,而不是成年奶牛。本研究旨在开发一种适用于成年奶牛的 JBT,该任务将可行性、有效性、敏感性和可重复性结合在一起。开发了三种 JBT,其中奶牛被训练去够或避免够到饲料器,饲料器的位置标志着奖励或惩罚。这些任务的区别在于惩罚器-奶牛被分配到“无奖励”、空气喷射或电击。然后,奶牛在两次不同的场合,两次暴露于三个饲料器的模糊位置。学习速度和对条件位置的正确反应比例用于评估任务的可行性。调整到达模糊饲料器位置的潜伏期用于检查反应模式是否与基线时有效且敏感的 JBT 所期望的线性和单调分级模式相匹配。在两个重复测试会话中到达饲料器的潜伏期用于评估任务重复过程中模糊性的丧失。使用空间 JBT 对奶牛的有效性得到了证明。虽然 JBT 可行性的影响很细微,但惩罚器确实影响了 JBT 的敏感性。没有一个 JBT 的可重复性可以得到支持。我们得出结论,使用空气喷射作为惩罚器可以为奶牛提供最敏感但不可重复的 JBT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/d9903534aeac/10071_2021_1563_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/f1342eada01b/10071_2021_1563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/f36f6fc8bbeb/10071_2021_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/cd8cdba60081/10071_2021_1563_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/0089b6497038/10071_2021_1563_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/420e3b1bd44b/10071_2021_1563_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/d3ded9d933a6/10071_2021_1563_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/b10dd86f0227/10071_2021_1563_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/6938f2317cac/10071_2021_1563_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/eca01ed3a8e6/10071_2021_1563_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/b111aa530229/10071_2021_1563_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/c139faa53242/10071_2021_1563_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/d9903534aeac/10071_2021_1563_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/f1342eada01b/10071_2021_1563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/f36f6fc8bbeb/10071_2021_1563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/cd8cdba60081/10071_2021_1563_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/0089b6497038/10071_2021_1563_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/420e3b1bd44b/10071_2021_1563_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/d3ded9d933a6/10071_2021_1563_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/b10dd86f0227/10071_2021_1563_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/6938f2317cac/10071_2021_1563_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/eca01ed3a8e6/10071_2021_1563_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/b111aa530229/10071_2021_1563_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/c139faa53242/10071_2021_1563_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8e3/8940804/d9903534aeac/10071_2021_1563_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a feasible and sensitive judgement bias task in dairy cows.开发一种可行且敏感的奶牛判断偏差任务。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):425-445. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01563-8. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Assessing the emotional states of dairy cows housed with or without their calves.评估与小牛同圈或不同圈饲养的奶牛的情绪状态。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Feb;107(2):1085-1101. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23720. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
3
Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows.住房和个性对奶牛判断和注意偏差的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01843-w.
4
Effect of pre-session discrimination training on performance in a judgement bias test in dogs.会前歧视训练对犬判断偏差测试表现的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Oct 12;27(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01905-2.
5
The effect of repeated testing on judgement bias in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).重复测试对家犬(Canis familiaris)判断偏差的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01689-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
6
Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.在一项平衡的“去/不去”判断偏差任务中,巴甫洛夫对学习的影响在大鼠和小鼠之间存在差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jul 28;331:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 23.
7
Housing conditions affect rat responses to two types of ambiguity in a reward-reward discrimination cognitive bias task.在奖励-奖励辨别认知偏差任务中,居住条件会影响大鼠对两种模糊性的反应。
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Nov 1;274:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.07.048. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
Separation from the dam causes negative judgement bias in dairy calves.与母牛分离会导致奶牛犊产生负面判断偏差。
PLoS One. 2014 May 21;9(5):e98429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098429. eCollection 2014.
9
Reward and punisher experience alter rodent decision-making in a judgement bias task.奖惩体验改变了啮齿动物在判断偏差任务中的决策。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 16;10(1):11839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68737-1.
10
A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).一种有前景的新型判断偏差测试,用于评估犬(Canis familiaris)的情绪状态。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):837-852. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01596-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory study of associations between judgement bias, demographic and behavioural characteristics, and detection task performance in medical detection dogs.一项关于医疗检测犬的判断偏差、人口统计学和行为特征与检测任务表现之间关联的探索性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0320158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320158. eCollection 2025.
2
Do cows see the forest or the trees? A preliminary investigation of attentional scope as a potential indicator of emotional state in dairy cows housed with their calves.奶牛看到的是整片森林还是树木?对注意力范围作为与小牛一起饲养的奶牛情绪状态潜在指标的初步调查。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 28;10:1257055. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1257055. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimism and pasture access in dairy cows.奶牛的乐观情绪与牧场使用情况
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84371-x.
2
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动物的乐观、悲观与判断偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.药物干预判断偏差:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:269-286. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
4
Pain-Induced Pessimism and Anhedonia: Evidence From a Novel Probability-Based Judgment Bias Test.疼痛诱发的悲观情绪和快感缺失:来自一项基于概率的新型判断偏差测试的证据。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Mar 20;13:54. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00054. eCollection 2019.
5
Avian Emotions: Comparative Perspectives on Fear and Frustration.鸟类的情感:恐惧与挫败的比较视角
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 17;9:2707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02707. eCollection 2018.
6
Assessing animal affect: an automated and self-initiated judgement bias task based on natural investigative behaviour.评估动物情绪:一种基于自然探究行为的自动化和自主启动判断偏差任务。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30571-x.
7
A cross-species judgement bias task: integrating active trial initiation into a spatial Go/No-go task.一种跨物种判断偏差任务:将主动试验启动整合到空间 Go/No-go 任务中。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23459-3.
8
Pessimism and fearfulness in dairy calves.奶牛犊牛的悲观和恐惧。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):1421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17214-3.
9
Pavlovian influences on learning differ between rats and mice in a counter-balanced Go/NoGo judgement bias task.在一项平衡的“去/不去”判断偏差任务中,巴甫洛夫对学习的影响在大鼠和小鼠之间存在差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jul 28;331:214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 May 23.
10
Threat intensity widens fear generalization gradients.威胁强度会扩大恐惧泛化梯度。
Behav Neurosci. 2017 Apr;131(2):168-175. doi: 10.1037/bne0000186. Epub 2017 Feb 20.